 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
07-30-2011, 07:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Commons
I have always felt the Topps 1959 Curt Raydon was significantly undervalued.
Actually , since I collect all Topps sets, I collect all Topps commons, and have much respect for all of them....well....most....or at least a lot. There was a recent thread here about whether the premium realized for the first and last cards in a set, common or not ( Palko v Mathews) makes sense beyond common hobby expectations 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low Pop/ High Grade Commons | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-04-2009 07:21 PM |
| Uncommon commons...who's your white whale? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 03-22-2008 01:27 PM |
| Looking for very low grade T206 HOF'ers and commons | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 08-17-2007 09:01 AM |
| T206 commons | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-05-2006 07:28 PM |
| population reports on prewar commons vs. pricing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-21-2005 11:54 PM |
Threaded Mode