|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think it's a wet sheet transfer or happened at any point during the printing process. Cool card though.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The cards probably got wet or damp at some point and it is probably some type of moisture transfer. Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 07-26-2011 at 11:31 AM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I believe actuall wet sheet transfers aren't so blurry, right?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I removed thousands of T206s that were packed extremely tight against each other for generations. PM, PB, SC, OMs, Hindu, EPDG, AB that were stored in an area where the cold/warmth fluctuated constantly too. Though many showed mold and mildew damage., Not one that showed this phenom. Can only guess as to the cause. Regardless, it's an interesting presentation, especially with the PB back! Last edited by Ladder7; 07-26-2011 at 12:03 PM. Reason: sounded like a moron |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually Steve, three of the Beantown find Old Mills I purchased from you did exhibit light "wet sheet transfers" (or "humid card transfers". They weren't nearly as pronounced as the example Iggy used to start the thread and probably not the kind of thing you'd notice if you were going through 1000's of cards, nor is there any way of determining whether the effect was caused by how the sheets were stacked in the factory or by the cards being tightly packed in tobacco boxes (as you described), but I had simply assumed it was the latter.
__________________
Looking for 1909 Obak upgrades, provided you don't mind me paying with torn and waterlogged 1971 series $20 bills... http://imageevent.com/boboinnes/obaks Last edited by Anthony S.; 07-26-2011 at 12:24 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
cool Anthony!.. I missed em all., Was the overprint the same brand of cigs?
do you still have these?.. I want to buy em back
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Water won't create a transfer after printing on anything lithographed. The inks are oil based because water is used to keep it from sticking to the plates in places it's not wanted.
Black inks can stay somewhat "wet" for well over a century, and all it takes then is pressure to make the transfer. So transfers on Old Mill, Tolstoi, and Lenox would have to be spectacular for me to believe them. I'm thinking it's possible with red too. Exposure to either Alcohol or solvents may also help cause something like that. The original card looks like it might be from something like that. The Barbeau looks to me more like transfer from a ledger. The lines just don't match a SC back. And ledger inks could well be water based. I have a very beat SC T206 I could experiment on, nobody wanted it as a trade, and I can't do much more to it than has alredy been done. I've got stuff to apply pressure, and mineral spirits and alcohol from my mechanic and woodworking hobbies. Enough interest? I may do it just to do it. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with what everyone is saying and honestly...this seems like something that someone could simulate...and I'm not sure how much of a premium I would pay for something like this that possible can be created?!
pete |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: T205, T206, E96's and Other Miscellaneous Cards | wcsportscards | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 18 | 10-11-2011 12:01 AM |
| T205, T206 & T207 Please Help..... | 1975Reds1976 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-09-2011 10:04 PM |
| T206 Graded Commons For Sale | iggyman | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 01-13-2010 10:15 PM |
| WTB T206 Sweet Cap 150 overprint HOFer SGC 40-50 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 01-02-2009 08:19 AM |
| T206 Willis Overprint w/Two Factory Designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-27-2005 01:00 PM |