![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And that's the key; to add the pop reports and come to the conclusion that only 7 of a card exists is a huge mistake. However if the combined pop is a 7, and another card has a combined pop of 50, you can get a good sense that the first is a tougher card.
Last edited by Matt; 07-10-2011 at 01:17 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC or PSA for your T206? And why? | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 03-09-2010 08:59 PM |
How accurate is the PSA Registry? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-24-2008 06:06 PM |
T-206 Wagner PSA Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 12-24-2007 09:28 AM |
Steve Novella's PSA 8 T206 Auctions--A Market Defining Event? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 204 | 10-12-2007 12:45 PM |
What is the opinions here of the PSA Registry? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 62 | 08-22-2005 11:40 AM |