 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
07-06-2011, 05:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Just to be clear did you cite in the title that the card was a psa 5 or a psa 5 mk? I would expect that it would be disclosed in the title that the card was qualified not just in the description. If you disclosed in the title that the card was a psa 5 but failed to cite it was qualified I would have to say, in my opinion, you were not being on the up and up.
As to the claim that it was the highest graded, i might have said it has attained the highest psa NUMERICAL grade though it has been qualified, though again that is simply my opinion. Last edited by iwantitiwinit; 07-06-2011 at 05:32 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| O/T: Ebay Strategies Revisited | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-30-2007 02:28 PM |
| Hopefully no one here bought that E97 Nichols on ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-10-2005 05:09 PM |
| Another Ebay T206 Nodgrass error FAKE from G.H. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-08-2005 12:45 PM |
| Beware of ebay "Security Check" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-03-2003 06:27 AM |
| An important eBay issue??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-27-2002 10:49 PM |
Threaded Mode