 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-30-2011, 04:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Matt- you are absolutely correct that there would be subjectivity, particularly for a photo that straddles two grades. But actual grading is likewise very subjective and very inconsistent. I don't believe this system would be any worse. When you have one where you can submit the same card to a grading company three times and receive three different grades, you have very few objective standards at all. Adding this photo quality assessment shouldn't make it any worse. But of course there will be some kinks to work out.
|
|
#2
06-30-2011, 04:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
A major obstacle would then become deciding which cards are "photographic" and thus eligible for this new grading method. I'm sure that would spark as much debate as whether postcards, cabinets, cdv's, etc. are cards.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A 6-year odyssey....AMERICAN BEAUTY 460 sub-set....75 cards complete (I think) | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 03-06-2011 12:38 PM |
| 168 Assorted Baltimore Orioles OPC Cards 1966-1980 | wpeters | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-30-2011 11:27 AM |
| Looking for people to write articles about certain cards. | mmync | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-27-2010 05:55 PM |
| FREE CARDS 50's cards | V117collector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 09-23-2009 07:58 AM |
| F/S Misc graded and raw cards ('33 Goudey, '41 Play Ball, 50's Topps and Bowman, etc. | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 06-29-2006 07:07 AM |
Hybrid Mode
