A New Idea for Grading Photographic Cards

[HRBAKER]

Barry,
That is most likely correct but maybe over time if someone were to do this then a separate "preference" if you will would set in for the double-graded cards and then the value differential would reflect that. Sort of like the difference between a PSA6 and a PSA6 OC or MC, but in reverse. In this instance the cards "with" the qualifier (the second grade) would see the growth in value making it harder eventually to move cards without it. Interesting thought you have.

[DanP]

Barry, I agree 100% with the concept. I also feel a weighted system makes sense even grading scores for centering and back damage. Why does a card receive the same penalty whether there's a paper tear on the back or the front? I know, some of you guys care as much about the back as the front so maybe not as good as example as the photo image.

1. If a weighted system were used photographic image could be 25% or more of the overall score

2. Card damage should be only 1/2 the penalty if it is on the back

3. Centering could carry more weight then say a minor softening corner

This is my grading system. I realize it won't work for most of you!

BTW, which card would you rather have?

[HRBAKER]

The one on the left, all day, all week.
To me the way that these are graded makes the number grades, regardless of TPG, almost meaningless. The photo' the thing.

[barrysloate]

Dan- all good ideas, but if we ever have any hope of getting one or more grading companies to make a change we should keep it as simple as possible. And I would give your Thompson a 4 qualifier, and the Radbourne a 1.

And this is my 4000th post. What do I win?

[edhans]

Barry,
Congratulations on your 4,000th post and a great idea. And that Thompson is only a four!? At least a 4.5, surely.

[barrysloate]

Ed- the first time around they will give it a 4. When submissions slow down then they'll offer the half grades. You know how it works.