On the easel...

[perezfan]

I was surprised as well. I was thrilled at the prospect of potentially winning it, but it felt weird to see it in Lelands. Plus, they gave it a rather lackluster photo... a very small image within the Catalogue. There's a lot of other artwork in there (that I felt was not as nice), which received more exposure.

I actually missed Graig's Koufax the first two times through, and was hoping the small pic would translate to a more affordable price. It had 6 bidders at the time it was withdrawn.

[GKreindler]

Mark,

Yeah, I wasn't terribly pleased with the photo either. That was the first thing that caught my eye in the listing, and I just couldn't understand why they didn't just email me and ask for a scan or something. Granted, they may have wanted to show the frame and all, but still, it could have been represented better.

Now, the thing about that that bothers me the most is that those who are perusing the auction and haven't seen my work would have nothing to go by but that photo. In other words, the painting will only seem as good as its reproduction, which in this case, isn't so great. I guess that's why it's so important for me to have everything shot professionally. Even though it costs an arm and a leg, it's worth it to have peace of mind about my portfolio - I get to control how and what people see in that regard. If the painting stayed and was photographed correctly, I think it could have made the consignor and Lelands more money.

Alright, I'm off my soap-box.

So, here's what I was working on earlier today:



I figured since Mantle is my father's all-time favorite, he was a good subject to tackle today. Or something. I've only got a few hours in, but I like what I'm seeing thus far.

Hope everyone had a wonderful Father's Day!

Graig

[whitehse]

I am NOT an artist but I can certainly appreciate extraordinary work when I see it and I can only imagine how frustrating it must be to see one 's own artwork that is a result of hundreds of hours of time be given less than stellar exposure like the Lelands auction did. I just never understood why, when selling a significant piece extreme care does not go into showing the piece off. I mean lets face it, we are not talking about a 500 dollar Stan Musial card here, this is a significant painting that required more work to showcase than what was put into it.

For the consignor and the artist this must be very frustrating.

[perezfan]

Maybe that's why it was withdrawn? The picture and overall representation were severely lacking.

Also... thanks Graig for your perspective. Any and all of us Net54 guys who saw it in Lelands' Catalogue were probably wondering what you were thinking/feeling.

[GKreindler]

Hey guys,

Just got this one back from the photographers. It still needs a little color tweaking, but hope ya dig it:



Now, back to work!!

Graig

[GKreindler]

Hey guys,

Got these three back today as well. The Collins was posted before, but I had to make some slight adjustments and rephotograph it. Anywho, I hope you guys enjoy 'em:


Eddie Collins, 1909, 9" x 12"


Mickey Mantle, April 14, 1951, 9" x 12"


Willie Mays, 1955, 9" x 12"

Hope everyone is having a wonderful week!

Graig

[perezfan]

Absolutely love that Willie Mays Painting! The lighting/shadowing on his face and cap are incredible. Such amazing depth to that one... I amost expect him to start talking!

But what is Mantle so sad about? Any info about the circumstances related to that pose? He looks like he needs some Zoloft