How Important is an Auction Lot's Description

[oldjudge]

Barry-If the fellow writing the auction description, supposedly someone who is knowledgeable about what he is describing, does not know the facts why should one assume that a buyer would necessarily know the facts?

[jcmtiger]

Jay, I agree with you. I have quite a few Detroit Old judge Players, but I definitely don't have the knowledge that you and Joe G. have on these cards.
But, I would certainly investigate and try to find out about the card to make sure it was described correctly. If it was not, I would try to return the card.

Joe

[barrysloate]

Another fair question. Some buyers are experts and know more than the auction house. I would say every time you buy an Old Judge you know more than the seller, and others probably do too. Admittedly, not every OJ collector is an advanced one, and some may be beginners. And no question it's a poor description- who calls an OJ an 1890 card when they are almost all late 1880's products.

But I think you want to know if a buyer should be entitled to a refund, and my answer is I'm not sure. Is someone bidding on that card solely because he thinks it might be the PL version? I suppose you could make that case if you wanted.

[barrysloate]

Joe- to respond to your point. If you won that card, and when you received it discovered it was not from 1890, would you really want to return it? It's still a nice example of a key OJ. Would that date throw you off?

[jcmtiger]

Originally Posted by barrysloate

Joe- to respond to your point. If you won that card, and when you received it discovered it was not from 1890, would you really want to return it? It's still a nice example of a key OJ. Would that date throw you off?

Hi Barry, because I only collect Detroit players, I would only buy this card for trade, so I would want it to be the rarer 1890 version

Joe

[oldjudge]

Barry-Forget PL. The description doesn't say PL, it just says rare 1890 version. The buyer may not know the Player's League from a player piano.

[barrysloate]

It doesn't say "rare", it just says 1890. Nevertheless, if the buyer were that upset with the description, then I suppose he should make his case and request a refund. My guess is nearly everyone bidding on the card would look at the scan, read the SGC label, and if they then won it, would keep it.

[oldjudge]

Barry-I believe every SGC label for any Old Judge says 1887. Second, the description is as follows:

The rarer of the bat-in-hand variations for Kelly, this Boston version has to be from 1890, following Chicago’s sale of the Hall of Famer in what was one of the biggest baseball deals of its time.

It says "rarer" not "rare" but it ain't either. Also, I emailed Bill to let him know about the mistake but no change was made.

[barrysloate]

Well then the buyer should just ask for a refund. He might face an argument, however. And the description should have been changed if an expert such as yourself told them about it. That would bother me a lot.

[Gradedcardman]

In my opinion it means everything. I bought a lot of 154 T206's in a recent auction. In the description the worst card was listed as fair. When the lot came there were 4 cards with holes in them and another 30+ with severe back damage. Personally I would of cut off my bidding at $3200 instead of the $4100 plus juice I paid. The 120 cards not damaged were nice but I still sent an email to the auction house that sold and have received no reply.

[bcbgcbrcb]

My feeling is that if the auction house was that specific in their description and it is inaccurate, then the buyer should be entitled to a refund, if they request one.

[Jay Wolt]

I VCP'd the correct card and the last one for SGC-70 (REA in '06) sold for a thousand $ higher
so did the improper description have anything to do w/ spirited bidding?
As the final # seemed low.