Need some help with PSA grading question!

[pkaufman]

I'd like to dispel the myth that PSA adjusts the pop report when you return their labels. I have sent several back to PSA over the years and no adjustment has been made. The labels were from cards that were not plentiful, therefore I could tell if they adjusted the number. I'm not sure about SGC, but PSA apparently has no one assigned to perform this task, nor do they really care about these numbers.

[glchen]

Originally Posted by pkaufman

I'd like to dispel the myth that PSA adjusts the pop report when you return their labels. I have sent several back to PSA over the years and no adjustment has been made. The labels were from cards that were not plentiful, therefore I could tell if they adjusted the number. I'm not sure about SGC, but PSA apparently has no one assigned to perform this task, nor do they really care about these numbers.

This is not true. PSA does update their pop reports if you send back the flips. I did this recently where I sent in about 20 flips with a submission. It took them a while, but when I checked if the certs for those flips still existed in the pop reports, they no longer did.

[jg8422]

As for the Beckett holders....I had to resort to C4 explosives to crack the case!

On a serious note...has anyone seen or heard of counterfeit PSA holders and/or flips?

[4815162342]

Originally Posted by jg8422

has anyone seen or heard of counterfeit PSA holders and/or flips?

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ight=fake+flip

[npa589]

Update: Slightly disappointed, but all in all - I think it's fair.


GOOD 2 MK 1909-1911 T206 PIEDMONT FRANK CHANCE PORTRAIT-RED
***Must just be ignorant to some of PSA's grading style... There is a pencil mark on the front of the card, near the right side of the face, but there is nothing else wrong with the card. It was originally BVG 3. I thought it would be 5 MK. Is it a 2 because the MK was on the front?


EXCELLENT 5 MK 1909-1911 T206 SWEET CAPORAL ED REULBACH GLOVE SHOWING
***Accurate

VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 MK 1909-1911 T206 PIEDMONT FRANK CHANCE BATTING
***Accurate, though I thought it should have came back as a 5 MK.
VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1909-1911 T206 SWEET CAPORAL HARRY STEINFELDT WITH BAT
***I guess I was incorrect about their process. They must have marked off for it being OC, and not MC. Is this what they do? They don't give a qualifier to OC, only MC?
It's at least a 6 with regard to corners and cleanliness of the card.

VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1909-1911 T206 PIEDMONT ED REULBACH GLOVE SHOWING
***This was an SGC 30, so I'm happy with this...***

EXCELLENT 5 MK 1909-1911 T206 SWEET CAPORAL GEORGE BROWN BROWNE, CHICAGO
***Accurate.

[4815162342]

Originally Posted by glchen

This is not true. PSA does update their pop reports if you send back the flips. I did this recently where I sent in about 20 flips with a submission. It took them a while, but when I checked if the certs for those flips still existed in the pop reports, they no longer did.

+1