T206musueum.com why?

[mcadams]

I only vaguely know of what you're referring to, but would like to know the full story. Were they selling T206 with self-altered backs on thier site?


I found the site to be informative, but have never purchased anything there.
I've also found the site to lack a certain degree of professionalism, given the terrible grammer that is used throughout-

"The negative black printing is in very fine details and it disproves the possibility of the black ink penetrate the cardboard. It also refutes the odds of the black ink wasn't completely dry during printing process and another cardboard stacked on top and the color transferred onto it."

[usernamealreadytaken]

What you say may be true John, but according to t206museum.com...

[egbeachley]

I guess they are number 1 until a better site comes along.

[atx840]

I took it as gospel before I found Net54 but after reading the FBI investigation work you guys did I rarely go back. The news articles on the rare card sales are interesting.

[CW]

I hadn't been to that site ever since the scandal was exposed years ago. I agree that it is odd for reputable auction sites to refer to t206museum -- they would be better served referring to Scot Reader's "Inside T206" or perhaps Trae's T206.org site if they want to spice up their auction descriptions.

[teetwoohsix]

I also stay away from that site. Once I learned the story of their "creations" I could care less what they have to say about T206 cards, or anything else for that matter. Also, kudos to the fine folks who exposed these idiots fraud

Trae's site T206.org is far better & ran by a very nice guy

Sincerely, Clayton

[T206.org]

Thank you, Chuck, and Clayton! One of these days T206.org will focus on more of the recent events and information like "that other site". We have a new site in progress, it's just slow going as a side project.