 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-17-2011, 10:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Right, the difference is definitely apparent, and the dark shading doesn't seem to be related to the card's general condition, i.e., dark card just as likely to be mint in all other respects as the much whiter specimens. Again, it seems to be the low-numbered series, as looking through my set, I find several numbered 1-72, but none after that. Also don't find any such darkened cards in my 1951 set, so perhaps it was just a foul-up in the pressroom that year. Just speculation on my part, Fred.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1952 Topps Sain/Page Pricing Question | quinnsryche | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 02-12-2010 02:16 PM |
| 1952 Topps PSA 9 question, photos added | badger_9 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 11 | 12-25-2009 12:07 PM |
| Question about 1955 Bowmans | abrahamrudy | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 12-24-2009 12:06 AM |
| Oliver Optics Magazine question | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 02-17-2008 12:17 PM |
| question about PSA 8 1952 High Numbers | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-25-2007 09:38 AM |
Hybrid Mode
