![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For some reason, my scanner didn't capture all of the card (seems to have missed the bottom edge), so it wasn't a true representation. I've scanned it again with a background and now it shows all of the card. Do you guys still think it has been trimmed? Using a magnifying glass, it just doesn't look like it.
[IMG] ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Leon - I think the scan of the raw card is bad. It does have the protrusion you mention, but if you look at the actual color border below it, it follows the 'wave' on both the top and the bottom.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The original scan borders and the card in the holder borders look different to me. If I had only seen the one in the holder I would have said it looked good. It doesn't look wavy in the holder while it did raw..
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hold a ruler to both, and you'll see what I mean (I just tried it).
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Please show me one post on this board where anyone says, or even infers, SGC is infallible?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since you are asking, yes, the Joss looks trimmed to me too.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the Joss has a chance of being ok. A very slightly curved cut can happen, it's unusual but possible. The bottom edge looks ok, no odd transitions from worn to not worn, and the overall quality of the edge looks the same all the way across. The top edge doesn't look as good, a bit more sharp, and there are a couple quirky things to the curve.
It will be interesting to see how it gets graded. Steve B |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thought I'd follow-up to this thread I started a few months ago as I finally sent the Joss in for grading. Though I was confident that it was not trimmed, the consensus from most all was that it definately was trimmed.. most notably Leon. I'm pleased that SGC found it to be unaltered and gave it a 70. Thanks to Steve B. (aka The Trim Detector) for giving me a ray of hope that the card was good.
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for people to write articles about certain cards. | mmync | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-27-2010 05:55 PM |
Grading "Never Before Known" Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 07-10-2007 09:02 PM |
Opinions on sending cards in for Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 12-09-2004 03:28 PM |
Grading Pre-WW2 cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-21-2004 06:34 AM |
Grading cards Ebay style | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-21-2003 04:44 PM |