checklist for T206 by teams?

[tcdyess]

I got through the first line anyway... they replied and requested the full checklist. I submitted it yesterday and will now wait. Thanks again to those who provided the list.

It is worth a shot, there must be more NY collectors out there that would find this one interesting...

Tim

[Tom S.]

Tim,

I hope that you are able to get PSA to follow through with your set request.

As an aside, I recently asked SGC if they would be able to create a Chicago American T206 Master set, and they are currently in the process of formatting it. You could always try SGC if PSA isn't able to help you out...

Good luck with your Highlanders set!

[cfc1909]

Is there any one at SGC that has enough knowledge about the 206 set to create such a list?

[Tom S.]

I don't know if anyone at SGC does or not.

In my case, I sent them an Excel document that contained information from several sources - most notably the outstanding back set lists compiled by Ted Z., Scot Reader's "Inside T206" e-book, and the Bill Brown T206 Super Set spreadsheet (thank you to those gentlemen for their research...I hope it's OK that I cribbed from your work! ).

I also looked at SGC pop reports (and even eBay listings) to come up with what I hope is an accurate list to send to them.

[cfc1909]

I would be glad to go over your list for you and check them for accuracy but would caution using the list complied by Ted Z. Can't say the White Sox list is inaccurate as I have not seen that list. There are plenty of errors on the back lists that were posted on this forum.

[tedzan]

I have not compiled any T206 Chicago American list.

I don't understand what you are referring to ?

I have reprised the thread listing the various T206 front / back combos. If you have any additional information or corrections,
please provide it and I will update the specific list(s).


TED Z

[cfc1909]

I am referring to the backs lists as being inaccurate. You have cards on confirmed lists that don't exist and cards on no print lists that do exists. Clerical errors happen when your compiling this much information, and confirming cards simply by posts or emails opens yourself up to bad inputs. But what bothers me most is when I have come to you with subjects/players that do not belong on the list, you have gone to great lengths, even crossed ethical lines to prove to me a card exists when it doesn't. Why? Because you have claimed on more than one occasion to have completed sets with these front/back combos that don't exist.

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=91120

You claimed to have completed the Sweet Caporal 150 No.649 OP set of 35 cards. Simon Nicholls shouldn't be on this list, but you can't remove it because you claim to have owned it. Keeping it on the list continues to put bad information out to collectors but removing it means you never owned it.

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=91361

Here is a "Mission Accomplished" thread for an American Beauty 460 set of 70 cards. You claim to own these 70 cards. "So, it's taken me 4 years to acquire 70 cards." 3 cards on this list do not exist with an American Beauty 460 back. John Frill is on this list of 70 that you acquired yet within the last year you claimed the card was a no print until a scan was posted that proved otherwise. How does a card go from being in your collection to a no print?

Recently you again claimed to complete the American Beauty 460 subset of now 75 cards. 75 is accurate this time. When asked by several board members to bring the AB 460 set to the Oaks show you gave no response. I came to you Saturday at the show to talk reasonably and see this set. You claim to have sold 28 cards including the Cobb for 4k Friday night. Other members including Leon L, Dan M and John M were at the show Friday and you could have shown them the set but you didn't. Simply put you can't show what you don't have. Why is it that you can scan sheets of uncut Bowman's yet you don't have scans of all 75 ABs or the Simon Nicholls 649?

Several collectors have been working for years on these lists, they were shared with you privately and you posted them and took full credit. But it's not the credit that bothers me, it's the inaccuracies and perpetuation of known bad information.

I won't sit and point out all of the mistakes on every list as some are close and others have mistakes into the double digits. Most importantly I won't give any credibility to these list knowing the dishonesty that has taken place in creating them.

I do have the lists that I work from and will be happy to help anyone that is working on a project that needs an accurate list. I'm hoping in the near future to have the lists in a format I can share with everyone.

I realize anyone can make a mistake it's what you do when that mistake is brought to your attention that matters.