 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
04-29-2011, 10:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I agree that it looks off. It is certainly flourescing more than the ones on either side. The paper doesn't look slick enough on the top of the card either (agreeing with Leon).
I think the blacklight is a good determining factor especially against a known authentic. The printing does look alright though so it really does come down to the paper on these. Very tricky. I need to look at mine again but I seem to remember that the edges on an authentic should all roll over and are not sharp. This is from the top looking down. I'll try and post a scan tomorrow to illustrate what I'm talking about. This would be more apparent on a NM card than a VG card. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Babe Ruth Fro Joy...is it real..scans added at #7 post!..BGS 5.0 just popped!! | 1966CUDA | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-13-2011 06:43 PM |
| FOR SALE: Extremely Rare/Unique Babe Ruth cards | fkw | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-23-2010 02:00 PM |
| 1928 Harrington Ice Cream #6 Babe Ruth PSA 4 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-30-2008 07:24 PM |
| 1928 George Ruth Candy: Babe Ruth GAI 4 For Trade | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 03-31-2006 02:46 PM |
| Foiled again....1928 Babe Ruth Candy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-27-2005 10:45 AM |
Threaded Mode