1915 Cracker Jack Advertising Card Joe Tinker Card?

[E93]

I doubt they would grade it even as "authentic" since it is not an authentic baseball card. It is a tiny part of a poster. Just my .02.
JimB

[gnaz01]

That's what I thought too, but it is nonetheless, a pretty cool item.

[David Halpen]

Those cutouts are neat. Here is the advertising poster that had sold at auction:





Here are my two cutouts from a poster. The Tinker (probably like yours) and a Frank Baker. However, the Frank Baker is not on this poster. However, it is located where Collins is on the poster. Thus, it leads me to believe that there were more than 1 type of poster.

[Rob D.]

It's a bit of a technicality and not worth a lot, but I don't think the Mullen could be cut out and presented as "whole," because it looks like part of the Maranville card overlaps the lower-left corner.

[gnaz01]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

It's a bit of a technicality and not worth a lot, but I don't think the Mullen could be cut out and presented as "whole," because it looks like part of the Maranville card overlaps the lower-left corner.

I think the Cobb would be a pretty cool "card". and IMO, I don't feel it would be worthless (I mean it si still a Cobb collectible)

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by gnaz01

I think the Cobb would be a pretty cool "card". and IMO, I don't feel it would be worthless (I mean it si still a Cobb collectible)

I didn't mean the Cobb isn't worth a lot. I meant that my point that the Mullen can't really be presented as "whole" because of the lower-left corner is a bit of a technicality and not worth a lot in the grand scheme of the conversation.

[gnaz01]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

I didn't mean the Cobb isn't worth a lot. I meant that my point that the Mullen can't really be presented as "whole" because of the lower-left corner is a bit of a technicality and not worth a lot in the grand scheme of the conversation.

Agreed

[gnaz01]

Yup, Rick. Mine could almost DOUBLE for your Tinker. Thanks for the reply.