![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Greg,
Welcome to the forum. There is a lot of knowledge to be had here and some nice fellas. I'll have a look at my '54 Aaron when I get home tonight to compare. There have been quite a few versions of PSA cases, and I believe the white + hologram looks legit. I know there is a thread somewhere on Net54 going over each version of the case and what it should look like, front and back. That is an older slab with the white printed on the case + sticker, and the front says PSA in rounded letters, which matches. They changed the front font as well as making the writing on the back of the flip totally inside the slab after that. It's hard to tell by the pics the degree of case tampering, although there are members here that may be able to tell by the photos. I'm no help on the '55, sorry. Last edited by scmavl; 04-05-2011 at 08:08 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jarrod,
Thanks for your comments about that version of the PSA case for the '54 Aaron. Good to know this. The difference in font size for the PSA label was also a cause for concern for me and looked different compared to all I have. As for the condition of the case - it looks much better against a white background than against a black one under light. I'll post the "seller photo" where the case looks good with the white background, and it's tough to see the cases flaws. With a strong light and black background, you can see just about every imperfection in the case including minor scuffs and clouding. I get alarmed when you see just about every low dollar card you own in a flawless case, and high dollar "key" rookie cards in cases that look suspect and handled - makes me now wonder. There is no reason for it. As for the card itself I am focussing on several issues of concern. I have looked at over 100+ cards ( on ebay ), and could not find another AAron rookie that had the bottom of his jersey bleed into the border with the exception of two other cards on ebay. One is a raw Aaron ungraded and listed on ebay right now for 554.99 that has the same issues as my psa 8 oc Aaron: (1) red specs/printers marks to the left of the braves logo, (2) the bottom of the jersey bleeding into the bottom border under magnification, (3) a grey dash above the fielding figure of Aaron, and (4) an indentation along the left border when the color changes from orange to grey ( see that? the whole grey section moves in slightly - weird ! ) It looks like the same card except for the centering and imperfections. I could also not find these issues on other 1954 cards of different players with the orange background or the Braves logo. So it makes me wonder - all of this AND a tampered case? hmmm I was curious to know if other people had Aaron's with these issues, again thanks for the help, your thoughts and for taking a look. Real or fake? I have enclosed a few more photos: 1) the seller photo against a white background 2-4) each of the issues 5) the ungraded Aaron on ebay right now, that looks similar to mine issue wise So do you think I should send it into PSA and can they help verify? All the best, cheers Greg |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Greg,
First welcome to the boards. Are you concerned that the logo was re-colored or touched up? In most of the examples of the Aaron '55 I have seen has that same imperfection the blue ink "bleeding" onto the yellow background.. Through my exerience collecting the '55 set in high grade it seems like a lot of the yellow background cards will almost always have black spots on them. I do not see anything wrong with your 55. I hope this helps.
__________________
1955 Topps PSA 7 or better Completed 1956 Topps PSA 7 or better 154/342 or 45.03% complete. Project started Jan 2009 Last edited by T205; 04-06-2011 at 03:02 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice pictures for a digital camera! Lots of people do far worse with a scanner.
A bit of what you're looking at is registration. On the 54 the red is printed a bit low and to the left. That will make some red print be below the inmage at the botom, and also make the orange background appear slightly left causing the indent for the gray of the uniform. It's also what makes the red of the feathers show up to the left of the headdress outline on the logo. I can't really see the gray line above the fielding pic. There's a few things that could be. I don't have an Aaron to compare, but there are lots of little differences in many Topps issues that aren't really recognized as variations but are there. The dots left of the logo are also tough to see, but stuff like that is pretty common on 50's cards. It's usually from a bit of ink spatter from overinking. (Some could also be plate differences caused by dust in the photo or platemaking process, but I'd have to see a group of identical ones to feel confident calling it that) Steve B |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edward and Steve - thanks for your comments and analysis.
Edward, Yes - I was concerned with color touch up on the '55 and also with the batting figure of Aaron having a fuzzy face. As you can see a normal size scan of the card looks great, but when you look under magnification at the logo, you see the extra ink ( extra blue dots below the logo and circle and the extra red outline to the right of the mascot's face and nose ), it could simply be print defect or variation. Wanted to hear from '55 experts like yourself on how common this is - thank you. I do not see these issues on my '55 Clemente ( including the face not being fuzzy like Aaron's), so it seems to be with the Aaron only, for cards I have from this set. Steve, I used a sony 10 megapixel I got 5 years ago for my birthday, it has a zeiss lens and allows you to really zoom in which is cool for card photos because you can really magnify things ( like a loupe in that respect ). Never use a flash, and then use a black background and a lamp behind you. The scanners are good because you get the actual size of the card for measurement, which cannot be done with the camera ( so you measure manually ). I used a loupe first to analyze the edges, colors, writing and other areas. The two things that freaked me out about the '54 rookie are the bottom of the shirt having the the red color bleed into the white border in both spots because the craig list fakes have the same issue. On the other hand, the figure of Aaron is presented very nicely detail wise and his arm logo, fingers, the ball and shoes are all very detailed and visible - looks legit. The indentation of the color change from orange to grey is also subtle and looks like a 1/48th of an inch indentation even under the loupe and also as you can see in the seller scan and my blow up. Does your Aaron also have this indentation? and do you think the shadow under the hat is the right color? The red specs to the left of the logo seem legit, but again, have not seen another Aaron like this except for the raw one on ebay right now for 554.99 that has every imperfection that my graded Aaron has ( red spots, bleeding jersey, indentation, stray grey line etc). If the PSA case were perfect, I would not think twice about it being legit. The stray grey line above the fielding figure of Aaron can best be seen in the seller photo ( first photo in my 2nd batch ). Thanks again Guys Much appreciated Greg |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WANTED: Johnson, Mathewson, Cobb and Ruth | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 10-18-2005 02:55 PM |