Goodwin Auction is open + Peck & Snyder Discussion

[GaryPassamonte]

It seems strange that if the biography was made specifically for the card that the lettering at the top would be chopped off. I know of no other CdV, cabinet, or card from this era that has this type of adhered backing as issued. The lettering is either printed or nonexistant. It just doesn't make sense that P&S would go to all the trouble of writing a detailed biography and then glue it on. Maybe I'm in the minority here, but this card does not seem to be a P&S to me. It could very well predate the P&S issues. Is it the same size as the other P&S cards?

[19cbb]

This reminds me of the Wagner strip/proof dilemma.

Btw, I agree with Gary on this one.

[benjulmag]

Originally Posted by GaryPassamonte

It seems strange that if the biography was made specifically for the card that the lettering at the top would be chopped off. I know of no other CdV, cabinet, or card from this era that has this type of adhered backing as issued. The lettering is either printed or nonexistant. It just doesn't make sense that P&S would go to all the trouble of writing a detailed biography and then glue it on. Maybe I'm in the minority here, but this card does not seem to be a P&S to me. It could very well predate the P&S issues. Is it the same size as the other P&S cards?

Gary,

I'm pretty sure the card is trimmed, which is why some of the print is missing. Most trade cards extant are trimmed and that is what helped them survive--being cut down to fit into photo albums.

Also, it might have been cheaper for P&S to glue on lettering than to make a business card with a verso that can be used for only one specific front image.

[19cbb]

From John Thorn's 'Baseball in the Garden of Eden'

Page 324
Note 123

"Pete O'Brien: Creighton posed for a photographer in the backswing of his underhand motion; the image is preserved as the front of a carte de visite issued after his death. Glued to the back of the card was a tattered and torn biographical note, the source of the Pete O'Brien quotation cited. Mark Rucker and I found his card in the archives of Culver Pictures in 1983."

[oldjudge]

If in fact the card that Corey has has bio glued to the back of a photograph then we can say two things:

1. The card was issued by Peck & Snyder after 1870 (when it moved to it's 126 Nassau St address). The card is both pieces.

2. It is unlikely that Peck & Snyder went out and grabbed some old images and glued their bio/address to the back. They probably had a photographer print up some new images from old negatives. If the front picture predates the card's issuance by Peck & Snyder, then it is most likely not a Peck & Snyder product.

Now the question is why would Peck & Snyder print a Creighton card after 1870. I keep coming back to the likelihood that it was made for an anniversary. The tenth anniversary of Creighton's death would be a somewhat solemn occasion, not one where gaudy advertising on the back of a card was appropriate. Therefore, a bio of Creighton made more sense. That seems to explain the different backs.
Also, the reference to Flanley, as I noted previously, does not appear to refer to Flanley playing when the card was issued, simply playing at a time discussed in the bio.
Finally, there are several references as to when Peck & Snyder joined forces, and they all say 1868. Till I see some conflicting information I am forced to believe this to be accurate.

[benjulmag]

Jay,

If I ever need assistance on a matter to help evaluate evidence, please don't be offended if I don't call you.

[oldjudge]

Corey-I am never offended when you don't call me. Just remember, we are all just searching for the truth.

[Matthew H]

Corey, thank you for posting the back. I have been curious about it since I first saw it in the Smithsonian book.

Do you think there is a chance that P&S just pasted the bio over their ad on the back? Does it measure similarly to the team cards?

[benjulmag]

Originally Posted by Matthew H

Corey, thank you for posting the back. I have been curious about it since I first saw it in the Smithsonian book.

Do you think there is a chance that P&S just pasted the bio over their ad on the back? Does it measure similarly to the team cards?

Without checking I can't be sure, but even if the bio is pasted over, I doubt there is an ad underneath. As to size, assuming it is trimmed, we can only approximate the original dimensions, but my guess is it would be in the range of other known trade cards.

[barrysloate]

This has been a very interesting discussion, but for it to proceed from here Corey would need to examine the back closely and figure out exactly what is going on. We need to know if the bio is glued on, and if so is it made of the same good quality paper stock of other P & S trade cards, or is it different paper stock and not part of the original production. I know I've suggested it is almost impossible that it could be a newspaper clipping that somehow fits the exact dimensions of the card, but we still need to know for sure. Then maybe we can develop a more cohesive theory.

[benjulmag]

Problem is card is framed and for me to inspect the back, I would have to take it out of the frame.