Name That Grade Game Is Over NO WINNER!!!

[Matt]

Psa 3
psa 2
psa 3 (mk)
psa 4 (oc)
psa 5 (oc)

[canjond]

psa 2
psa 1
psa 3 (mk)
psa 4 (oc)
psa 5 (oc)

[scmavl]

Marquard PSA 4
Bager(?) PSA 2
Lajoie PSA 3 (mk)
Bescher PSA 5 (oc)
Jinchman PSA 4 (mc)

[Frank A]

1. 3
2. 2
3. 2mk
4. 3mc
5. 4mc

[Ease]

Thanx Larry for the contest!
1. Psa 1.5
2. Psa 1
3. Psa 2mk
4. Psa 4mc
5. Psa 4mc

[ChiefBenderForever]

4
3
3
5
5


8675309

[ullmandds]

Thanks LArry...

psa 2
psa3
psa3 mk
psa4 oc
psa3 oc

But knowing psa they're probably all higher!!!!

[dstraate]

3
2
A
4oc
3oc

[3-2-count]

Hi Larry. I'll take a shot......

1.5
1.5
2mk
5mc
4mc

[t206hound]

Marquard - 2.5
Baker - 1.5
Lajoie - 4.0MK
Bescher - 5.0 (no qualifier)
Hinchman - 5.0MC

[CMIZ5290]

Marquard psa 4
baker psa 1
lajoie psa 4(mk)
hinchman psa 6(mc)
bescher psa 5(mc)

[tiger8mush]

(my guesses, without looking at what others said, so i'm probably way off haha)

2.5
3
3(mk)
7(oc)
6(mc)

Rob

[nebboy]

Marquard (Hands at Thighs) - PSA 3
Baker (Follow Thru) - PSA 3
Lajoie (Portrait) - PSA 3 (mk)
Bescher (Portrait) - PSA 5 (oc)
Hinchman (Batting) - PSA 4 (oc)

[jcmtiger]

Psa 4
psa 2
psa 4 (mk)
psa 3 (oc)
psa 4 (oc

[Leon]

How much of a disparity in folks opinions can there be? The Marquard goes from a 1.5 to a 6. LOL

[GasHouseGang]

Marquard (Hands at Thighs) - Beautiful front, paper loss on back PSA 2
Baker (Follow Thru) - PSA 1.5
Lajoie (Portrait) - PSA 3 MK
Bescher (Portrait) - PSA 4 OC
Hinchman (Batting) - PSA 5 MC

[Matt]

Originally Posted by Leon

How much of a disparity in folks opinions can there be? The Marquard goes from a 1.5 to a 6. LOL

I think the rub is between what it should be graded given the PL and the possibility that PSA missed the PL altogether. Given the nature of the 'game', the actual grades given are probably going to be off from what they should have been.

[Jacklitsch]

Originally Posted by Leon

How much of a disparity in folks opinions can there be? The Marquard goes from a 1.5 to a 6. LOL

There is no doubt in my mind that PSA missed the paper loss on the Marquard.

Originally Posted by Leon

How much of a disparity in folks opinions can there be? The Marquard goes from a 1.5 to a 6. LOL

We are talking about PSA here

[glchen]

Psa3
psa1.5
psa3mk
psa4mc
psa4mc

[Matthew H]

Marquard 4
Baker 2
Lajoie 4MK
Bescher 3MC
Hinchman 5MC

I don't think psa gives OC qualifiers to cards that grade under 5.

Thanks Larry!

[tbob]

I agree with the previous poster, these grades would be completely different if graded by SGC.

Marquard-3

Baker- 2

Lajoie- 2 (mk)

Bescher-AUTHENTIC (trimmed)

Hinchman-4 MC

[shaunsteig]

Marquard - 2.5
Baker - 2
Lajoie - 3 MK
Bescher - 5 MC
Hinchman - 4 MC
(bit harder on the last two without the back scans).

wondering if it'd be possible, at the end, to collate people's votes into a poll in order to see the distribution, and see if the mean agrees with the TPG.

Thanks for setting this up Larry!
--S

[AndyG09]

Dang, Larry, using PSA makes this tough with their "throw a dart at a number" grading scale. I will give it a go. Thanks for the opportunity!

Marquard 5
Baker 3
Lajoie 2
Bescher 5
Hinchman 4

Best,

Andy

Marquard PSA 2
Baker PSA 2
Lajoie PSA 3
Bescher PSA A
Jinchman PSA 5 MC

[Mikehealer]

Here goes Larry..

Marquard-5
Baker-4
Lajoie-4
Bescher-5
Hinchman-5 (looks like a Hindu back)