![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which way to cross? | |||
PSA |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 12.50% |
SGC |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
38 | 47.50% |
Leave as is |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
32 | 40.00% |
Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd leave it as is. These are rare cards so I doubt there'd be a premium going to either TPG. Unless there's a pinhole that I'm not seeing in the T216 Wagner 2b, I would look into possibly flipping that card to SGC (or cracking out and re-submitting to PSA). That card looks undergraded.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
leave them in the holders they are in and spend the extra coin on more cards.
nice cards Eric.... ![]()
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jim,
The crossover cost isn't that much. I'm thinking that I'd like to be able to add them to a registry somewhere as I work on the set. I've actually got quite a few more that are raw that will need to go to the grader that the others cross over to. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
in that case you need to choose SGC.
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No need to rush to a decision. Maybe just wait until you go to sell them.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rob,
I'm thinking that I'm going to have them displayed on the wall of an office, thus I'd like them all to be displayed in the same holders, it will look much better that way. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A lot of people have voted, but nobody really put much reasoning behind why they voted as they did.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you plan on displaying them in such a manner I vote SGC. To me the the black framed borders look much better and stand out against a wall or on a mantle. Either way, you have some great cards and that SGC 50 Bender is beautiful. Good luck with the set!
__________________
Always looking for rare Tommy Bridges items. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Perhaps you could get them professionally framed with UV protection coating on the glass? Good luck with your decision, they are beautiful cards you have! Rob ![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
leave them as is.
they're in decent protectors and look fine and safe. i wouldn't put any more money toward the grading companies. all the best, barry |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
crack them and have them framed with uv glass.
If you holder them SGC has a better presentation with the black mattes, but the flips will turn an ugly color under most artificial light. They will be a lot safer under protective glass, something neither PSA nor SGC have in their holders. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Advice on the t206 set | Niko | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-18-2010 11:04 AM |
N310 Mayo Boxing set | Archive | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 0 | 02-08-2009 09:07 PM |
1939 PlayBall Set for sale - All SGC graded | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 02-28-2008 01:00 AM |
How about building a type set of Cabinet Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 05-19-2007 05:41 AM |
It is time for me to sell my 1956 Topps Master set to work on another quest | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 03-13-2007 06:41 AM |