 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
03-11-2011, 06:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
That's funny, I was just looking at this card and thought "I'm sure SGC and PSA would grade it a "1" because of the paper loss on the back". I'd guess that's why it is still in a BVG holder.
http://cgi.ebay.com/1948-LEAF-8-SATC...item230ee9dd56 However, my personal opinion is that this card should be a "2". I don't think back damage should downgrade a card as severly as it would if the same damage was on the front (I know I'm in the miniority here). I have quite a few SGC 10's with some back damage that fit this critieria. https://picasaweb.google.com/danp306...33316378810738 Dan
__________________
Dan 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BVG vs. SGC | ichieh | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 05-24-2010 06:03 PM |
| For Sale BVG graded T206's | drdduet | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 04-05-2010 09:18 PM |
| "impressed"- with....bvg....grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 04-29-2009 03:09 PM |
| FOR SALE: 1949 Bowman BVG Graded | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-18-2009 01:00 PM |
| FS - 1954 Bowmans - SGC and BVG - high grades | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 06-03-2007 12:51 PM |
Threaded Mode