I'm outing an auction...so sue me.

[slidekellyslide]

If they take my advice and have an expert look it over then I will think they are not trying to pull a fast one..if they continue to let this run as is..especially with the comments they've made in the Q&A Section then it makes me suspicious.

[FUBAR]

First thing i notice is how beat up the frame is but how nice the painting is, condition wise, frame is dirty, painting is clean... screams reprint put into an older frame to me. I would avoid!

[GasHouseGang]

I would tend to agree with Jim. Looks like a new piece, made to deceive, put into an old frame. Whoever painted it, did a poor job. If this was made to advertise their product, you should be able to recognize the "famous" baseball players using their gloves. I can not because they are so poorly rendered.

[drc]

I would safely guess it's a modern piece (putting it politely). If you think it would look nice on your wall, it has some value. Clearly the 1920s date and 'used for advertising' is in highly questionable.

P.s., the frame is hideous. Throw it in the dumpster.

[Mr. Mitt]

When compared to an original Peach advertising piece (below), the painting is laughable. There are problems, too numerous to mention, with each glance. The perspective isn't even correct and the shadowing is horrendous. That said, I couldn't paint it!