ebay buyer protection question

[Teamsets4u]

If you returns the cards with tracking to prove it, you will probable loss an ebay case.

[scmavl]

What a bummer man, sorry to hear he already hit you with negatives.

[Jim VB]

Please take this as constructive criticism, not as an attack.

First, no sales on Ebay are final, regardless of what you say in the listing. Ebay has made it clear, numerous times, that a dissatisfied buyer may return anything they want for a full refund.

Second, you will help yourself immensely, if you adjust a few things in your listings. Your scans are far too bright. I don't know if you adjusted your scanner to get the best pictures, but it it far better to give an accurate picture of the card. Your scans don't seem to do that.

Third, You should show front and back scans of all cards. If you don't, you run the risk of buyers being dissatisfied with something they have never seem. Also consider scanning against a black background instead of a white one. You can use a piece of construction paper.

Lastly, when selling ungraded cards, you must describe the condition of the cards. Buyers expect this.

However, even if you had done each and every one of these things, the buyer may have asked to return the cards. There is no way around it. Refusing, or even delaying the return is a losing bet. Upon his first inquiry, agree to the return and refund as soon as you get the cards back. It's not worth the negs to try to save a $20 sale.

[tonyo]

Originally Posted by Jim VB

Please take this as constructive criticism, not as an attack.

None of that taken as an attack. Thanks for trying to help. My scans are too bright.

I almost feel good about the negatives (almost). I hate that I feel like I have to take the time to make the listings perfect and fool proof. I've made a handful of returns for what I consider no good reason. But I did it anyway.

This guy just rubbed me the wrong way when he ignored my question.

I'm not perfect, but I try to be reasonable and fair. I would have taken the cards and refunded the money with only minor blinking had he just been respectful, but he was a douche.

I have nothing good to say about clipper-baseball2010.

[toledo_mudhen]

Although I would thenk the Gilliam and the Black cards should have been "no problems". Both tuff cards to pick up cheaply in that condition. IMHO. If it makes ya feel any better - I agree Dude is a douche.

[tonyo]

Originally Posted by toledo_mudhen

Although I would thenk the Gilliam and the Black cards should have been "no problems". Both tuff cards to pick up cheaply in that condition. IMHO. If it makes ya feel any better - I agree Dude is a douche.

Thanks...that does make me feel better. The douche had no problem with the Gilliam and Black cards, but he negged me on those anyway. Speaks to his character I guess.

I'm thinking if I decide to invest 30 minutes today trying to get eBay to reverese the negatives, then the fact that he gave negatives to those two auctions would help my case?

[theseeker]

Despite winning the very public Tyfanny Vs Ebay case, the lawsuit profondly changed Ebay's policy towards their ultimate customer, the buyer. The publicity generated from Tyfanny Co. buying 200 Tyfanny brand listings on Ebay and finding that 198 were fakes threatened to erode the Ebay empire.
With so many sellers on this site, I'm sure it will be an unpopular stance, but I firmly believe that Ebay's adopting "the customer is always right" approach is working out best for all involved, in the long run. All this is not to say the buyer wasn't a douche.

[tonyo]

Originally Posted by theseeker

Despite winning the very public Tyfanny Vs Ebay case, the lawsuit profondly changed Ebay's policy towards their ultimate customer, the buyer. The publicity generated from Tyfanny Co. buying 200 Tyfanny brand listings on Ebay and finding that 198 were fakes threatened to erode the Ebay empire.
With so many sellers on this site, I'm sure it will be an unpopular stance, but I firmly believe that Ebay's adopting "the customer is always right" approach is working out best for all involved, in the long run. All this is not to say the buyer wasn't a douche.

I agree with you.......the policy probably helps alot more people than it hurts, and the buyer is a douche.

The verdict in the Carterscards thread on the homepage forum (assuming it is true) gives me hope of about a 5% chance of having my negatives reveresed if I decide to invest 30 minutes on the phone!