![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The high reserves are a turn off for me. I will not bid under this format.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree-wanted the ewing and mascot n172 but kept bidding and never reached the reserve- I wrote them that I am tired of wasting my time trying to guess a reserve. They should put a minmum bid high enough to satisfy the consignor-otherwise all they do is annoy potential bidders. I was willing to pay a fair price but will no longer bid in "guess the reseve auctions". The consignor should not put it up for auction without a high minumum bid so serious get bidders can get involved.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've now seen people on the board complain if minimums were too high and people advocating for high minimums over reserves. I guess no matter what an auction company does they will have critics of their formula.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cute job with the word-smithing. The folks that are unhappy with high minimums are not unhappy with the fact that high minimums are used instead of reserves - they were just unhappy with how high the minimums were. Setting a minimum so high that there is only a 50/50 chance even 1 bid would be placed is more like a sale then an auction. Setting a strong minimum bid instead of a reserve would placate most folks, so long as the minimum was reasonable.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Glyn,
I've been buying cards here in the greater Boston area for decades and found virtually every card type from the 1880's to present, but NEVER was offered any Boston Garters. Were they distributed here in my area? I'd appreciate any insight and if you want to post some here or on facebook, that would be awesome! BTW, Glyn, I hope you had a great birthday with your child yesterday. Thanks, Bill Hedin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm all for the disappearance of the BP confusion that Paragon has adopted. Last edited by Matt; 03-02-2011 at 01:01 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Your response sounds like wordsmithing they weren't complaining but they were complaining? From your response you feel that a consignor should be willing to let the market dictate what the card will bring? Why does a consignor have to risk a loss or selling a valued piece of ther collection for less than they want? If a company is willing to give some cool items a shot at what you perceive to be retail why shouldn't they? It seems Keith was still going to get his money as it was based on number of items you wanted per page and not a flat commission per item sold. I welcome the new approach and if I decide to sell some of the better items in my collection it is certainly an avenue I would consider. Why should I RISK the possibility of losing on an item if I dont have to? I may be misunderstanding your post but it sure seemed like that was what you were saying.
Last edited by glynparson; 03-02-2011 at 09:45 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paragon Auctions | glynparson | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-11-2011 03:14 PM |
Conducting auctions on the B/S/T | Adam | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 74 | 06-07-2009 03:20 PM |
Legendary Auctions Acquires Assets of Mastro Auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-10-2009 08:33 PM |
Popularity of Web Auctions Helps Fuel Growth in Live Auction Industry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-26-2007 09:29 AM |
Robert Edward Auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 05-07-2004 12:55 PM |