Beware Carterscards2006

[barrysloate]

Peter found the link. The Morales thread reached 805 posts. Is that our record? If I respond to post #805 do I establish a new world's record?

[bh3443]

Originally Posted by barrysloate

Peter found the link. The Morales thread reached 805 posts. Is that our record? If I respond to post #805 do I establish a new world's record?

Thank you so much Peter and Barry. You are the best!

It's a very touch autograph fiasco going on in my immediate area. The COA's are from a gentleman who is no longer with us. Most of these generated from the same area where the Morales ones come from.

It's a very sad situation. Many people invested 10's of thousands of dollars and I feel bad that this greedy situation has occurred.

Thanks again!
Your Friend,
Bill

[buymycards]

I believe this thread is the longest thread with no mention of Seinfeld or Monty Python.

Oops, I guess the record stops here.

Rick

[Ease]

Originally Posted by buymycards

I believe this thread is the longest thread with no mention of Seinfeld or Monty Python.

Oops, I guess the record stops here.

Rick

Rick, don't get em started, I was hoping all the bad Seinfeld quoting/youtube/etc had finally stopped!

[Rich Klein]

Thread about basically nothing that just took and became a Net 54 viral hit.

In the middle of that thread -- Leon and I agreed to go to lunch instead of just calling or sending emails -- that might have been the best non sequiter ever in the history of Net 54

Rich

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by barrysloate

Peter found the link. The Morales thread reached 805 posts. Is that our record? If I respond to post #805 do I establish a new world's record?

Actually, it's redundant to say a new record is set or established. No need for the new. Any time a record is set, it's new. One of my pet peeves, committed by hack writers and talking heads (not that you're either, Barry).

[T205]

what about the teapot thread on the old site?

Or the one about debate of Shoeless Joe picture on a T202?

[Leon]

The longest thread ever, on Net54baseball since inception, was


"An Open Letter To Christopher Morales and STAT Authentic"

....In Feb of 2008. It had 805 posts as Peter mentioned. We have a ways to go....

PS...this is new and old Net54 ...and the predecessor to it, the old Fullcount Baseball board, wouldn't have had any "close" to that long....

[mintacular]

bump

[Fred]

Cmonnow, only 29 more posts to break the "top 5" for number of posts. Is this thread going to make it? Hopefully not....

[novakjr]

It's been a few days since I've posted here. Let's make it 28 more to crack the top 5.

[wrapperguy]

I feel left out. This thread took hours to read. Interesting and painful to read all at the same time.

[Spartan]

I'd be ashamed to keep this post going (guilty obviously) Get a life. NEXT. LET IT GO

[barrysloate]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

Actually, it's redundant to say a new record is set or established. No need for the new. Any time a record is set, it's new. One of my pet peeves, committed by hack writers and talking heads (not that you're either, Barry).

Doesn't a new record supersede an old record? Yes, it's slightly redundant but you see it in print on a regular basis, so you can argue it's an accepted form. I could say the Beatles wrote "a new song", or I could say they wrote "a song" and you could assume by the context it's new. Either way works for me.

And of course we had the Joe Jackson thread. That was a whopper!

[bh3443]

Originally Posted by barrysloate

Doesn't a new record supersede an old record? Yes, it's slightly redundant but you see it in print on a regular basis, so you can argue it's an accepted form. I could say the Beatles wrote "a new song", or I could say they wrote "a song" and you could assume by the context it's new. Either way works for me.

And of course we had the Joe Jackson thread. That was a whopper!

Hi Barry,
I'm 1/2 way through the Morales thread. I really want to thank you and Peter for helping me locate this. The information in this archive file is very valuable in terms of what I am doing for a customer with those COA's.
If any of you can link me to the Joe Jackson or NY Dinner link they will occupy my up-coming week!
Thank you, me friends!
You are the best!
Bill

[barrysloate]

Hi Bill- great to see you posting every day! The Joe Jackson thread occurred last year; the NYC dinner thread was in 2007 (I think). But I don't ever use the search function, so somebody else should help you with this one.

Regards, Barry

[Ease]

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=124045=Joe Jax Thread

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by barrysloate

Yes, it's slightly redundant but you see it in print on a regular basis, so you can argue it's an accepted form.

You also see things like "The card has had it's corners trimmed" on a regular basis, so I guess that's an accepted form, too.

[barrysloate]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

You also see things like "The card has had it's corners trimmed" on a regular basis, so I guess that's an accepted form, too.

Yes, but "it's" is not an accepted form.

Another redundancy: "What time is it now (as opposed to what time was it two hours ago)?"

[scooter729]

I hadn't chimed in yet, but have been following along. Just wanted to be a part of something special here if we break the top 5.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Bill, if you click on "replies" or "views" to the top of the first thread on the main page, it will bring up all the greatest hits.