Beware Carterscards2006

[barrysloate]

Originally Posted by HBroll

But a hunch won't win in court.

No, it won't win in court. It's just an opinion for the chatboard.

[CMIZ5290]

Guys- there is one way to look at this. A hundred years from now, who will give a @#$%?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by CMIZ5290

Guys- there is one way to look at this. A hundred years from now, who will give a @#$%?

Or 2 days from now.

[Ease]

Or RIGHT NOW! very entertaining thread though.

[CMIZ5290]

Are we done?

[CMIZ5290]

I will say this, i think the posting of the newspaper article was somewhat uncalled for (PUP). Carters had excellent feedback on many transactions until this incident. No need to go that far back in a man's past. What's the saying? What goes around......

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by CMIZ5290

I will say this, i think the posting of the newspaper article was somewhat uncalled for (PUP). Carters had excellent feedback on many transactions until this incident. No need to go that far back in a man's past. What's the saying? What goes around......

I disagree. When sellers in the hobby have been convicted of felonies like embezzlement (or, in the case of others, fraud or even rape), I think we have a right to know who we are buying from.

[ChiefBenderForever]

Originally Posted by CMIZ5290

I will say this, i think the posting of the newspaper article was somewhat uncalled for (PUP). Carters had excellent feedback on many transactions until this incident. No need to go that far back in a man's past. What's the saying? What goes around......

All the more reason to keep a low profile and respond to upset customers who might get extremely upset and go venting in public, exposing possible shilling, bringing up public records that might include embezzling 1.6 million dollars. The domino effect could've been avoided with a simple response, a response from someone who claims great customer service. What we've got here is failure to communicate.

Originally Posted by CMIZ5290

I will say this, i think the posting of the newspaper article was somewhat uncalled for (PUP). Carters had excellent feedback on many transactions until this incident. No need to go that far back in a man's past. What's the saying? What goes around......

What do you have for me Kevin. What is coming around?? Not sure but you sound like you may be threatening me here. May not be the best suggestion. I don't file lawsuits. HINT HINT. Never had an issue with you in the past and would like to keep it that way. So I hope I am reading that comment out of context.

All I see here is a bad deal in which Todd got a bad card and a seller that will not respond to a simple request but then has some incriminating evidence of shilling and has a nasty past history. I have my beef with Carters from a few yrs back anyways. This info just seemed to fit the bill here.

Who cares if Todd was to submit to PSA, Beckett, and SGC for opinions and they all came back Evidence of Tampering. Does this change the simple fact that the seller is refusing to speak with him in regards to this incident. This would indicate guilt typically.

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Or 2 days from now.

Oh, I promise you it will get a lot better tomorrow. A little birdie told me so.

[CMIZ5290]

David- somehow or another, i believe you.