![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even better! Thanks.
Last edited by Theoldprofessor; 02-21-2011 at 08:07 AM. Reason: Idiocy |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Freddy, being from Maine, seems to have had a fondness for the red hotdogs that we have up here.
Rawn
__________________
Not a forensic examiner, nor a veterinarian, but I know a horse's behind from a long ways away. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's a neat card. It should have an (MK) qualifier. Here's another vintage 'stache, a la Chaplin:
[IMG] ![]() Here's another missed qualifier: [IMG] ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think PSA takes too much into consideration on registration. I had a Mathewson T206 portrait that got a PSA6 that was REALLY bad.......fortunately, I still got GREAT dollars for it............
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think it's a (MK) issue unless the stash was added post production. It is as the OP suggests a registration issue or printing process issue. PSA should take that into consideration reducing the grade accordingly.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've wondered about my E103 which our friends at SGC still gave a 50, although I didn't totally love the registration on it...
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oh, I thought it was post-production. It's even neater since the flaw occurred where a mustache would be.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My contribution:
T206 Downs (with the red lips) & '89 Bill Ripken FF double print (one of my favorites) ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello all!!
how about a "bearded Randall" ![]() Peace Johnny |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Double vision.........
![]() |
![]() |
|
|