![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have the Schmidt, Wagner throwing, Miller fielding, Doyle throwing.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wagner fielding is the least encountered, in my estimation. But I like Mathew's question better...
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
how about some scans?! personally I think the miller fielding and the wagner fielding are equally difficult...nice pickup!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
my lone e102 type is evers.
i got it from the very first auction offered by the nice fellow who often puts quarters in his posts. it's a beaut. all the best in your most admirable quest, barry by the way, it's always great seeing vintage scholar, steve m., back on board!!! Last edited by ethicsprof; 02-03-2011 at 11:37 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's about half of mine...
![]() and upon reflection, the good doctor is probably right about Miller fielding being Wagner fielding's equal in difficulty. Last edited by FrankWakefield; 02-04-2011 at 12:49 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a matty in psa 6 Chase in 5 that will 6 and a few others in 6 as well~
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a few back from SGC
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barry Arnold wrote in #9: Thank you for the grade promotion. My teachers will be pleased to learn I'm a "vintage scholar". Really, I'm just fairly good at cutting-and-pasting - a necessary job in old hobby periodicals.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll put them up as soon as I get them back (16 of 29) from SGC (good decision I hope vs. PSA) I'm guessing anywhere in the 4-5 range on grades but I'm certainly no expert. Can't wait to share them with you all and thanks for your input. I was hoping to complete a set now but after seeing the Cobb rookie at 14k. OUCH!!! not gonna happen.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
http://www.legendaryauctions.com/Lot...x?lotid=114293 As for the difference in condition of E101 and E102 here is a good example. I have seen more E106 Benders than E101,but again only in a three year span. ![]() ![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
with the e101/e102s it comes down to appearance also. alot of have diamond or oc cuts. to find a high grade (4 or 5) perfectly centered is a dream and should command a premium although on some of the players i don't know if that's possible. premium shouldn't be placed on the e102 because of the old "1908" dating as that's been proven false so the cobb is not his earliest "card".
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice cards Joel, real beauties.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Advice on the t206 set | Niko | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-18-2010 11:04 AM |
T205 Set condition/backs at National | Steve_NY | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-02-2010 08:28 PM |
T207....indeed a strange set....let' talk about it ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 78 | 06-11-2010 09:00 PM |
1935 national chicle psa high grade complete set | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 04-12-2008 03:12 PM |
e93 Standard Caramel - my new favorite set | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 02-26-2007 02:55 PM |