![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() 1963 Topps, as far as I've seen, is not necessarily known to have rough edges, so I don't think the smooth edges on this card are an issue. SGC is not known to grade sheet-cut cards, and their reputation is well documented on this forum. This card, and its previous sales, have been discussed in a few threads before, and you might be able to learn a bit more about this card with some searching of past topics. I believe the lone PSA 10 sold for $80K a few years back, and was known at that time to reside in the Dmitri Young collection. I do not recall a scan of that PSA 10 ever being posted online. It will be interesting to see where this SGC 98 ends this time. The current eBay seller likely is consigning the card for the owner. For the record, and as many probably know, this seller (prewarcardcollector) is absolutely top-notch with scans, descriptions, and customer service. One of the few eBay sellers that still runs actual auctions (sigh). Last edited by CW; 02-02-2011 at 11:59 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I too have had many experiences with brent, all good i might add.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This ebay auction seems legit. It would be interesting to know whats the true market price on this card, at least ebay market price. Do you think there may be more price manipulation by big auction house? I dont understand how can this card drop from $28,000 to $20,000 (including buyer premium) in less a year
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Big auction houses are the same as Ebay. It all depends on who is seeing the card at any given time.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which auction houses are legit, which are known to manipulate price.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
In a thinly traded item, one buyer can make a huge difference. The first time it sold, two or more buyers drove it to $28,000. Once one of them became the seller, instead of a bidder, it dropped. Not difficult to understand. Quote:
And, should you meet some of these guys in person, and shake hands with them, count your fingers before you leave. ![]()
__________________
Jim Van Brunt |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Since this thread has veered off topic anyhow....
1963 Stargell RC, SGC 88. http://www.huntauctions.com/phone/im...79&lot_num=697 So far, so good, but then (1) submitted in holder to PSA for crossover, rejected (2) cracked out and submittted to PSA, rejected for trimming (3) submitted to SGC hoping to get back into an 88, and: 12 1963 Topps 553 WILLIE STARGELL ROOKIE High# 0 - T7
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can someone measure and see if this Rose SGC 98 is trimmed? I thought about placing a bid at the last moment before the auction end, hope to win this card as long as this card is not sheet-cut, or altered in anyway.
Based on my nonprofessional view, this card looks too good to be true for a 1963 card. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1963 Pete Rose SGC 50 | t206 cubs | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-27-2010 05:00 PM |
FS Kelloggs Pete Rose Lot $47 DLVD | ChiefBenderForever | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-13-2010 10:24 AM |
25 years ago today, Pete Rose and hit #4192 | FrankWakefield | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 09-11-2010 01:33 PM |
Please Explain the Pete Rose Rookie to Me | M's_Fan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 125 | 05-18-2010 02:19 AM |
M101-5 Blank backs all SGC graded | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 03-03-2008 05:15 PM |