![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree, the SGC 10 looks great and though I am new, I would say that card should be graded higher. The paper loss seems to be minimal.
Is there a process to see if SGC (or any other company) would review and reconsider the grade? |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flaking vs. paper loss | Orions father | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-13-2010 09:08 PM |
WTT: HUGE tradelist of T205, T206, T207 & E90-1 | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 08-15-2009 10:43 AM |
Whats the story on grading when there is paper loss? | cobblove | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 08-08-2009 03:50 PM |
border chipping vs paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-06-2008 02:40 PM |
paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |