|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nothing to it -- thanks for asking / challenging me. In the process I came to realize that something which I had considered fact (namely, the reason that ABs are thinner is due to a thinner pack size) may not be universally accepted. I'm still fairly new at collecting T206s, so I'm hardly an expert. Just trying to learn something new every day.
--S
__________________
collecting primarily T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, 1952 Bowman, 1964 Topps Giants, Yankees HOFers. E-mails preferred over PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
you need to check out this site-I am not saying Scot is wrong but I don't think AB packs are thinner. I am pretty sure they are the same size as other 206 packs.The AB cards are thinner or at least 98% of them are or at least the 80 or so ABs I own are that way.
I don't think we have found the exact reason the AB cards are cut different than other 206 cards. I am always looking for answers and trying to learn http://www.baseballandtobacco.com/
__________________
T206Resource.com |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question on authenticity of T206 Mathewson which leads to a rookie grading dilemma... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-10-2007 08:37 AM |
| T206 "350-460" Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-26-2007 05:45 PM |
| T206 Howie Camnitz PSA 10 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-11-2005 08:39 PM |
| T206 Beckley sale question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-04-2004 05:42 PM |
| T206 Ty Cobb Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-09-2002 01:21 PM |