1916 Boston Team Photo w/Babe Ruth???

[bcbgcbrcb]

To the seller's credit, he has now adjusted his auction description to remove Babe Ruth's name and has also significantly reduced his BIN price accordingly.

[sox1903wschamp]

Seller did reduce it. It is still pricey but it is a bin and as mentioned, a nice non Ruthian piece. BTW, I take back my comment on the fuzziness of the photo. It is not so bad and I think I see "cheaters" in my near future.

[lhoyle]

Here is another auction, advertised for Bill Carrigan, that DOES have Babe Ruth, as seen on the left. No mention of the Babe at all in the auction.

http://cgi.ebay.com/1915-BILL-CARRIG...item2eb010393f

[birdman42]

We bust on kids for wearing their hats sideways or backward. Some of the old-time ballplayers didn't seem too concerned about "hat decorum" either Check Barry in this photo. Even as late as the Goudeys you see images of guys with their hats cocked off to one side or twisted around.

Bill

Originally Posted by lhoyle

Here is another auction, advertised for Bill Carrigan, that DOES have Babe Ruth, as seen on the left. No mention of the Babe at all in the auction.

http://cgi.ebay.com/1915-BILL-CARRIG...item2eb010393f

[bcbgcbrcb]

Good eye, Lee. Of course that one is a reprint and not really worth anything anyway.

[vintagecpa]

As a non-expert on these type of items, I'm curious about what the 1915 Red Sox photograph (without Ruth) price range should be if it were to be auctioned off. Thanks.