 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-18-2010, 05:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I like them. If they could put to use some of the old unused images that the Topps Vault sells now (color negatives) onto some of the classic card designs instead of new players, I'd like it even more. Maybe they have and I just haven't seen any. I don't buy very much of the new products anymore.
I don't really understand why they reprint the same exact card. They have done this in some of the newer football sets (ie. 1957 Topps and newer) over the last 8 years or so. Why would I want a 2001 Topps recreation of a 1972 Topps Roger Staubach RC and all its parallels...chrome ect.?? 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New theory why American Beauty cards are narrower than other T206's | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 53 | 04-05-2010 09:16 PM |
| 1920's "W" cards - why bad image ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-15-2007 06:36 PM |
| 1920's "W" cards - why bad image ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-15-2007 12:59 PM |
| Phantom Values of Baseball Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-07-2005 12:20 AM |
| Grading Companies (Overview & Opinions) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-27-2004 08:37 AM |
Hybrid Mode
