![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is why I started this thread. I had thought I had seen all the various T206 PSA flips; I was wrong. Thanks Jon.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA has issues,
Why in heck would they put "Cleveland" on the flip, yet not put "T206"???? They also put 1911 on a card only issued in 1909 (150 series back)... Kooks doing kooky stuff IMO Idiots! An artist must have added the "P" on the back from what I can see, so this card has edge corner damage, scrapbook damage, and ink added... worth $74, if that. IMO Last edited by fkw; 12-07-2010 at 01:38 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This auction may not gain much interest due to the fact that there is a reserve on the item; however, I still think it's worth at least $100. I'd buy it for that right now. (I'm sure they want more than that though)
Last edited by Matthew H; 12-07-2010 at 01:47 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Frank
very true the card is only worth 50 to 75 bucks but if let go at a traditional auction more than likely it hits 200. I didn't realize the back was so bad but a grade 1 Young portrait will hit 200 give or take and depending on what back it has.
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Now this is an unusual PSA slip (although a legit holder):
http://cgi.ebay.com/1908-09-Cy-Young...item45f752b5cb Last edited by asoriano; 12-08-2010 at 12:01 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
frank has convinced me to go down from my(and Jon's) 75 figure to 74.
i will stand corrected by frank ward's expertise 'til the day I collapse. those who have moved toward higher figures also have my esteemed reverence but not my vote on this particular occasion! best, barry |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
as for the PSA flip, some have argued that this is an old but legitimate flip. Now I know that PSA previously did not specify the backs on the T206 flips. And the typeset of their oldest flips looked different than currently. I'm not really aware of any other evolutionary changes to the PSA flips. In this specific case, does anyone have a T206, or any other card, where the PSA flip doesn't specify the set name? For that reason alone, I'd be leery that this is a fake.
__________________
collecting T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, and 1952 Bowman. e-mails preferred over PM. Last edited by shaunsteig; 12-07-2010 at 09:50 PM. Reason: correct typo |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I still feel that if this was a fake flip, there would be one of two things... a very high dollar card in the holder, or a card that is really over-graded. In the case at hand, neither applies.
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. Instagram: @vintage_cigarette_packs |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
See post above.
__________________
My Collection (in progress) at: http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/BosoxBlair Last edited by Bosox Blair; 12-09-2010 at 10:19 AM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This shouldn't be that complicated. Can't someone who has PSA membership, or whatever it is a fellow has to deal with them, can't he email in the scan and they can look at the slip and number on it, and tell what the deal is??
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It appears to be a legit flip. I have definitely seen the # sign on the
right side of graded T206's in the past. It seems to be a clerical error of some sort. Just did a google image search and found at least one other card with the odd "#" on the right. A PSA 9 Waddell portrait that recently sold at auction.... http://www.goodwinandco.com/LotDetai...igher%E2%80%9D ![]() Last edited by CW; 12-07-2010 at 11:03 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Everything is legit in regards to the Young posted above (including the flip).
Here is an example of a bogus PSA holder: ![]() Last edited by asoriano; 12-08-2010 at 12:06 AM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
There are lots of different fakes out there. (And to CW, the # has nothing to do with it. I know there was a period when this was on flips.) You can all buy what you want with your money - not a penny of mine would go near that card. And it ain't just the holder - it is the card (more importantly) too. Cheers, Blair
__________________
My Collection (in progress) at: http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/BosoxBlair Last edited by Bosox Blair; 12-09-2010 at 10:21 AM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA made an error in regards to the year.
Yes, it should say "1909-1911" or "T206" instead of the 1911 designation. In my opinion, this card is not altered. I bet if this card was regraded today it would probably come back as a PSA 1 with the "MK" designation (but I've never really seen an alteration on the BACK of a card). Last edited by asoriano; 12-08-2010 at 12:36 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For sale - Vintage Football cards - RAW & GRADED - Sets, Singles, Partial Sets | Shouldabeena10 | Football Cards Forum | 4 | 09-24-2012 11:02 AM |
F/S T206-220 cards,Cobb & all 48 SL'ers | Julian Wells | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 08-17-2010 02:55 PM |
T206 For Sale: 220 cards, Almost 50% of set | Julian Wells | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-01-2010 04:34 PM |
1933 Sport Kings Near Set for sale, All PSA graded | Comiskey | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 03-31-2010 02:10 PM |
Anything Wrong with This PSA Flip? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-19-2008 01:56 PM |