![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find this distrubing and please someone back this up. I understand the reason why, however you guys areslamming me for aging reprints while you guys are soaking originals and altering the card in such a way to get a higher grade. When your selling your card to you disclose to the buyer, hey i gave this a bath in water for a couple days do it would look nicer for you and so i caould sell it to you at a higher price. So who's really doing the missleading?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Soaking is not altering the card. Giving a card a bath just cleans it up and lifts the grime, no crime, nothing to disclose. If someone takes the time to clean up a card and make it look nicer than it was they deserve to get a higher price, after all, eye appeal is everything. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
People who soak cards to remove paper, gum, etc. from the card are not trying to defraud the people they are selling it to or creating a situation where someone is defrauded. Often people do disclose that a card was altered when they sell it.
Original card + water = nicer original card ... no fraud Reprint card + "aging" = unknown reprint card...fraud BTW, if you know the answer as you state, why ask the question? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok. So if you soak the card to enhance the appeal of the card doesn't sanding, re backing, trimming help enhance the card too?
So if soaking's ok then whats wrong with trimming or rebacking as long as the reback is an original card? Don't those enhance the appeal of the card too? The word card doctors come to mind. Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Derek- do you actually believe your argument, or are you just giving everybody a hard time?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This reminds me of a guy I knew years ago who started selling computer cards for satelite dishes which enabled you to recieve pay channels at no monthly cost. I asked him about the legality of it and he said ,"it's legal for me to sell them,but it's illegal for people to use them".
![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My car gets a "bath" on a regular basis. That doesn't make it FAKE.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That makes no sense. You can legally own a reprint.
Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No one has given me a reason not to believe my argument and as long as you guys keep posting on this thread I'll keep responding.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The poster also needs to learn the difference between there and their, and slander and libel. Greg |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So basically you really have nothing of any substance to say about the topic besides grammar issues?
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
.
Last edited by Vol; 12-06-2010 at 01:11 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 reprints | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 01-20-2010 03:46 PM |
EBAY has lost touch with what made them great... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-28-2008 09:30 PM |
Boston Globe article - ranking Sox managers - card pics - Fan Craze, T205's, D304, etc. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-24-2008 07:43 AM |
What made this National great for you ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 08-15-2007 10:50 PM |
Obak reprints? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-22-2005 10:03 PM |