BCCG Strikes Again

[joeadcock]

Have read this thread with interest.

Ultimately, the most responsible person is the buyer as he/she made the decision to buy the card. It is the buyer's responsibility to get all the information they can(if they desire) to know what they are buying. If they did not(which we dont know), then it is they're responsibility.

Not withstanding the obvious intent of the buyer(and the obvious BCCG intent in their grading system), the buyer will always be responsible as they made the decision to purchase.

If one were to argue that the buyer was duped by false information, agreed but they the buyer should have made sure there was some way to back out of this(i.e. guaranteed return policy).

I agree with posters, the likely lack of ethics of seller as well as the BCCG grading system(not of any use to those on this forum). And I agree, it is BAD.

It is possible as FUBAR says, that person is happy with their purchase as is.

[hunterdutchess]

They can keep the BCCG system just make it:

BCCG 1: POOR OR BETTER
BCCG 2: GOOD OR BETTER
BCCG 3: VG OR BETTER
BCCG 5: EX OR BETTER
BCCG 7: NM OR BETTER
BCCG 9: MINT OR BETTER

No more 10's making people think the card is a gem. If they would have done this in the first place there would be no issues. Come on BECKETT!

Examples:
Howe RC BCCG:http://cgi.ebay.com/1951-Parkhurst-G...4#ht_529wt_905
Howe RC PSA:http://cgi.ebay.com/1951-Gordie-Howe...#ht_500wt_1156

$1600 MORE FOR THE SAME CARD? The seller puts BVG BGS BCCG and then the buyer sees a big 8 in there new nice looking BCCG holders.

Also look at these Jordan RC:http://cgi.ebay.com/1986-86-87-FLEER...5#ht_500wt_922
http://cgi.ebay.com/1986-Fleer-Micha...#ht_500wt_1156
NM Jordan RC selling for $600+ when you can get a NM 7 for:
http://cgi.ebay.com/MICHAEL-JORDAN-R...#ht_500wt_1156

But there BCCG is making $$$ screw the buyers because they did not do there homework. BS.

[oldjudge]

This is why I would never buy a Beckett graded card or have a card graded by Beckett.