 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
11-18-2010, 09:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
In my opinion, the back matters very little
In mho the back really matters very little. I think the grading companies should break their grades down into a grade for the front and then a grade or qualifier for the back. I don't get hung up on back damage, staining, writing etc.. If the front is attractive and nice, then I enjoy the card, no matter what is on/ or is missing from the back. An example of this is if I could get an E98 Mathewson with a beautiful front, but has paper loss on the back and is graded a 10/1 because of it; and it is priced under $900 because of the damage....I would take those all day. Just my two-cents.
Happy Collecting and Good Discussion. Tim Kindler 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The first published hobby article, 1935....noted here | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-25-2007 08:43 PM |
| Hobby Retrospect | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 02-16-2007 10:10 AM |
| PSA discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 103 | 05-11-2005 12:16 PM |
| Objective card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 10-15-2004 09:05 AM |
| New trend on E-Bay? Selling cards rejected by grading services as such. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-27-2004 11:02 AM |
Threaded Mode