![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Knowing that the groundlings are being solicited to help decide his fate might be punishment enough for Bruce.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not going to say publicly whether or not Bruce should be suspended; that's not my call. But I will say that Bruce's sole purpose for linking the news story about Keith was to mock his liberal politics, and to make a political comment of some sort. Although Keith is a major collector and has posted on this board, the only hobby connection Bruce made was he hoped this would cause Keith financial hardship, and in some convoluted thought process, Bruce hoped to be able to buy his collection on the cheap (which of course he wouldn't, since many others would offer far more than he would).
Suspension is up to the moderators, not me. But the thread was not cool. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How about a poll?
That should be fun.
__________________
@jimmyleiderman |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My distaste for Bruce is well known. I abhor the intent of this thread. As Barry stated, the only purpose was to make some claim that this proves that conservative politics trumps liberal thought and wish financial failure on a fellow collector.
This post has no place on a hobby board. However, in no way should Bruce be suspended or banned for this action. As reprehensible as the original premise was, it doesn't come close to reaching that level. It may show us the workings of a narrow minded, hateful individual, but the world has plenty of those kind. He's said/done far worse in the past. My expectations of Bruce are so low, I'm sure we will see far worse going forward. But we shouldn't ban him for being a moron (apologies to all other morons for lumping him in.)
__________________
Jim Van Brunt |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Lots of deep thoughts on this page. Heavy, hand-wringingly deep thoughts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ax96iVmTCI
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets Last edited by calvindog; 11-07-2010 at 11:04 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Since it's just watercooler talk, it would be harsh to ban them from their basic sustenance, but they could be assigned this task for the next month.
http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/200...123AA3B5A18ED0 They could divide the task amongest themselves, so it wouldn't be that much of a hardship on any single one of them. That's my paper loss common's worth. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Massive Baseball Card Collection | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 03-23-2009 05:31 AM |
FS: My entire 1980s Baseball Card Collection! HUGE LOT! PSA/BGS | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 03-05-2008 02:34 PM |
Any advice on putting a collection together. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-19-2007 08:32 PM |
how does one decide to sell | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-23-2006 06:18 PM |
Liquidating Collection | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 03-18-2005 07:07 AM |