![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which would you prefer? | |||
A card that is NRMT-MT with 85/15- L/R centering over an EXMT card that is 50/50- L/R |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 11.32% |
A card that is EXMT with 50/50- L/R centering over a NRMT-MT card that is 85/15- L/R |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
74 | 69.81% |
It doesn't matter to me, I look at other characteristics |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 18.87% |
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What JimB said.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Centering is important to me also as I prefer PSA's stricter grading on centering (w/ NQ) than SGC's.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Centering is important to me as well so I voted for the 50/50 option. However, IMO, centering should play no part in the numerical grade of a card. The grade of a card should be determined solely on the condition where the card is evaluated/graded based on it's own environment – good or bad – not the lack of quality control from the factory. PSA don't even follow their own standards. Taken directly from their website, "the experts are asked to grade the condition of the card on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being best." Centering is not a condition. PSA's O/C qualifier is a joke! Anybody that needs to see an O/C qualifier to tell them that the card is off center probably shouldn't be in this hobby.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Being tied almost exclusively to the Old Judge issue these days, centering means almost nothing to me. If I can find a card that is on my want list and has a nice picture, I am not going to be concerned about centering at all.
Even when I was collecting other pre-war and post-war issues, poor centering did not detract from the aesthetics of the card for me as much as bad edges, bad corners and a bad image did. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find myself leaning more toward better centered card than higher grade ones recently. although I am working on a 1962 mars attacks which is really tough to find centered
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors Last edited by Republicaninmass; 10-06-2010 at 01:56 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would prefer the lesser grade, better centered card and, like one of the prior comments, attach more significance to L/R centering than top-bottom.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"Would you prefer a card that is NRMT-MT with 85/15- L/R centering, or an EXMT card that is 50/50- L/R?"
Hmmm... which one's cheaper?
__________________
-- the three idiots at Baseball Games https://baseballgames.dreamhosters.com/ https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/baseballgames/ Successful transactions with: bocabirdman, GrayGhost, jimivintage, Oneofthree67, orioles93, quinnsryche, thecatspajamas, ValKehl |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what JimB and Jeff said.
best, barry |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Poll: Preferences to displaying your cards | WhenItWasAHobby | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 07-29-2010 12:34 PM |
New Poll at top- Defects..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-01-2007 07:13 PM |
Pick the new Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 12-19-2006 04:32 PM |
New Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 10-09-2005 07:30 AM |
The Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-28-2002 01:14 AM |