![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: SGC Grade | |||
40 VG 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
135 | 76.70% |
50 VG/EX 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 21.02% |
60 EX 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 1.14% |
70 EX+ 5.5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 1.14% |
80 EX/NM 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Remember this? I thought I would bump this thread since the card is on it's way from SGC. Additional comments and votes are welcomed.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd say it's on the 30/40 borderline, but considering the overall eye appeal of the card (which I don't think grading companies do enough of) I'd give it a 40.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The toughest 1957 Topps Card in High Grade | Archive | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 11 | 11-04-2007 09:00 AM |
Why would SGC not grade this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 08-13-2005 03:37 PM |
Three of the same card, same grade. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-16-2005 11:47 AM |
low grade wagner card needed | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 04-29-2005 12:44 PM |
Board opinion on grade of this card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 01-22-2004 06:40 AM |