 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
09-16-2010, 09:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I'm sure you have looked closely at that 4 card, but I'd look again and look real hard. IMO there is no way that someone at SGC assigned a card with that eye appeal a 4 unless they spotted a serious defect (wrinkle, etc.)
Also since SGC has no qualifiers, it is possible that a card which might have drawn a 6 or 7 showing minor erased pencil on the reverse could get a 4, I think. Might be worth calling Michael there to see what he says...maybe the grader can provide some insight. Cheers, Blair
__________________
My Collection (in progress) at: http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/BosoxBlair 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cracker Jack Blowout | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 01-16-2009 07:46 PM |
| PSA to SGC Crossover Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 03-14-2008 10:29 AM |
| M101-5 Blank backs all SGC graded | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 03-03-2008 05:15 PM |
| 1915 Cracker Jack low grade partial set SGC PSA Cobb Matty | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 17 | 01-11-2008 05:45 PM |
| Question about submitting N172 Old Judges to SGC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-27-2003 10:06 PM |
Threaded Mode