 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-13-2010, 07:54 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Keep in mind...
...that it was really easy to keep the fronts of your T206s in great shape, with sharp corners and everything, if you were willing to glue the back into a scrap book. The reason the SGC 60s are so nice is because they survived the 100 year trip to today without the aid of glue (or at least glue that was not easily dissolved).
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 
|
|
#2
09-13-2010, 09:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I personally would pay a premium for a T206 that I wanted for my collection that displayed a beautiful front with nice square corners but may have a flaw on the back such as slight glue residue etc from being mounted in a photo album. As long as the paper loss & residue is at a minimum it's all fine by me. The Johnson you show imo has to much paper loss though for my liking to warrant adding a premium to it. Pretty card none the less. Below is an example of a Johnson portrait I own which I did pay a premium for that may give you a better idea of at least what my criteria is for paying up. Card has a NM front but has a small paper tick in the 2nd "E" in the word Sweet, and a little disturbance in between the "A" and 'R" in the word cigarettes on the reverse. Hope this helps.
 
__________________
Tony A.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
