![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That being said I would rather return something to a consignor than have them be thoroughly pissed that they got killed (realized price) on their item. All auction houses are different and this is my opinion only. TO those that will say..."then it's not an auction, it's a retail sale" I would say that is certainly your right to say that. I will stick to trying to help all of our consignors not get creamed.....And I realize this might not be a popular view but it is my view ![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let's put it this way, ain't no one getting a good deal in this auction.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is more like a retail sale and there is nothing wrong with that or protecting consignors.
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice stuff.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leon:
I agree with you 100% and believed that for years as a consignor myself but have always been told by the auction houses that it is in both mine and their best interests to start the bidding lower to attract more bidders. Based on this, I have almost always been unhappy with the starting price of my items and believe that the final sale price of many of my items fell short of expectations partly because of the low starting bid. If the starting bid was at the level that I had requested, like you said, I would either be happy with the result or get my item back. Now that I am looking it as a bidder, the "new" higher opening bids are forcing me to pay almost a "sale price" for an item that I want just as an initial bid. It feels to me like I am coming out on the short end both ways and am not real pleased with this turn of events. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it's fine to do an auction this way, beats having hidden reserves, shill bidding, etc.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 09-03-2010 at 02:46 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My main point is that when I wanted to apply this logic with my auction house consignments over the past few years, the auction houses basically all refused to start my lots at much above 25% - 30% of market value. Just when I have finally accepted that it is the way of doing business on that forum, now things seem to have changed to the consignors advantage when I am in more of a buying mode.
As I mentioned, the Speaker is a probably a better example than the Cobb. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Disclaimer: I have never consigned to or operated an auction.
It may have to do with the quality/rarity or the volume of item(s) that are being consigned. If one consignor brought all of those Novelty PCs to the table I can see him or her being able to dictate what terms (within reason) that they will consign under, i.e., starting bids, reserves, seller's premium, etc. Last edited by HRBAKER; 09-03-2010 at 02:44 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good point, Jeff
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a very good example of my point:
Last year I consigned a 1910 Minor League Team RPPC which pictured Joe McCarthy, a HOF'er and an extremely early image of him, in an SGC 10 holder. I paid somewhere around $450.00 when I bought it and was looking to have the auction house start the bidding in that $400 - $500 range. They did not do so and chose to start the bidding at $100.00. Final sale price was $100. I see in this auction, two very nice minor league team RPPC's both with HOF'ers pictured in SGC 1.5 holders and starting bids of $500 on each. I guaranty you that by the end of this auction, the consignor will have gotten at least $500 for each postcard at a minimum. That is where I have a problem with what the auction houses are telling me compared to how other consignors are being treated. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The prices aren't that high. There wont be any steals on those PCs but they'll be sold. I think 2500 is a low reserve for the Cobb.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The idea that most auctions are honest and fair went out with the Easter Bunny I'm afraid. If Goodwin wants to start his auctions with high starting numbers, so be it -- at least that part of the auction is transparent. In a fair auction, the market will dictate the value of the cards. If they're overpriced, we'll soon find out. As someone who collects PCs, however, I don't think the Novelty Cutlery's starting prices are too high at all.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Goodwin Auction | Yankeefan51 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 02-14-2010 02:34 PM |
Goodwin & Co. January Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 01-07-2009 04:16 PM |
19th CenturyOnly auction - PCL ....started | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-23-2008 03:26 PM |
Auction house double standard -- take two | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-11-2007 06:15 PM |
Question concerning lot 950 in the Goodwin & Co. auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-24-2006 05:12 PM |