 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-01-2010, 02:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
t206 print mark
Hello All_
i have a phillipe with a similiar "print mark" in the top border....its a terrible scan, but also part 2 namer....i bought off ebay for like 60 bucks...i mainly collect t206 "freaks" and saw this example, said what the hell....they are a bit rarer than expected, but nothing real "exciting"....  there are some "printers crop marks" on some t206 backs, they are a bit tougher...theory- these marks where placed on sheets to align them for dicing....some of my examples are oddly cut which show parts/full crop marks on the backs....i have scanned ebay over the years and they occasionally pop up, but are tuff 2 find to each his own, i place a primuim cause of there "rareness" but nothing crazy sweet like printers scrap  all in all they are fun and unique...these examples are noteworthy tho...as for matty proof....that is in a league of it's own and deserves a new thread devoted to it!! Leon!!LOL!!as u know, printers scrap is different than production t206..big differences.. Peace Johnny 
|
|
#2
09-01-2010, 09:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
t206 print mark
These are interesting as they have always seemed very random to me (sometimes on front, sometimes on back, sides, etc). As mentioned unless it is distinctly a proof they don't seem to get much of a premium although they seem like they should as other printing mishaps seem to. Attached are some I have held onto, the Young is hand cut/trimmed but can't say if it was actually a proof or not.
|
|
#4
11-02-2010, 08:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I got this card the other day, and, after taking a hard look at it, thought of this thread. Please take a look at each vertical border, at approximately halfway up/down the card. There are a couple of horizontal marks -- directly opposite from each other.
 The right side is more visible -- a relatively bright blue horizontal mark. The left side is more subtle -- blue, but very light, almost transparent. It is hard to see in the scan, but it is very clear with a loupe. Below are scans of these marks.   The difference in these blues reminded me of post 131 in the following thread http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...+proof&page=14 So, what do you think? Are these some sort of printer's marks? Do they tell us something about the printing processes used? Last edited by srs1a; 11-02-2010 at 08:22 PM.
|
|
#5
11-02-2010, 09:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Scott
if you look at 206s closely most have those marks-side to side and top to bottom. Tom I would think if the Young is a proof it would be a blank back.
__________________
T206Resource.com Last edited by cfc1909; 11-02-2010 at 09:26 PM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A T206 printing question for Bill Heitman, or anyone ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 62 | 03-06-2007 03:52 PM |
| Question for the T206 experts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 01-25-2007 03:49 PM |
| T206 printing mystery | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 57 | 09-03-2006 04:44 PM |
| T206 verses N224 - scarcity question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-02-2005 01:05 AM |
| T206 Ty Cobb Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-09-2002 01:21 PM |
Hybrid Mode
