![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim B
1st....The color differences of the Bowerman and CYoung with respect to the other 3 cards on this strip totally contradicts the 6-color process that American Litho. used to print their standard production T206's. Therefore, I have to question your observation...... "I think they just cut a strip off of a sheet in the place that included Wagner's own image." 2nd....We haven't discussed the back of this strip. The back is simply a strip of thin white cardboard that appears to have been pieced together. And, not the type of cardboard backing typical of T206 cards. Finally....Jim, how do you account for the vertical lines between each card ? They are not printed lines. Regards, TED Z |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do we know who owns it?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Isn't it owned by the same guy that owns the PSA 8 Wagner, the Diamondbacks owner?
__________________
Jim Van Brunt |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Peter,
Both the T206 "Gretzky" Wagner and the T206 Wagner strip card are part of the Lovely Day... Last edited by iggyman; 08-19-2010 at 09:02 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am still puzzled how Jim's view was so different from Ted's (and others). The issues at least some don't really seem to be subjective ones.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimB
Hey ole buddy....we had several interesting conversations at the National in Baltimore during that week. You asked me my opinion of the 1949 LEAF Joe DiMaggio you acquired, regarding its color variation. I pointed out to you the quality aspects of this card, which made you quite happy about it. And, you got a "kick" from the TyCobb/Ty Cobb card some one showed me at the show, who thought it was a real one. But, now there are at least 7 guys who have personally examined this Wagner strip at the National that differ with you on it. I'll respond to your 3 comments...... Jim...."1. I do not understand why ALC could not have printed a sheet that looked like that." The 6-color process used by lithographers back then applied the individual ink passes simultaneously on all cards on a given sheet (or strip). Therefore, it is IMPOSSIBLE for this strip to have been printed with the CYoung and Bowerman cards to have certain colors missing, while the other 3 cards' colors are virtually complete. Jim...."2. The back did not look pieced together to me. It looked like one piece. And under a loupe it looked just like any other T206 cardboard (without the ad printed on it)." We discussed the "backing" on this strip. In no way, is it a normal blank-backed T206 card's cardboard. It's a bright white piece of carboard, that does not jive with the cardboard used in 1909 to produce the T206's. Jim...."3. I think they simply printed lines between cards on this particular pre-production test run." These so-called lines are not printed, but are actually separations between the cards. Examining this strip under high magni- fication revealed this. Furthermore, this observation is reinforced by the separation between the CYoung card and the Kling card at the upper right end of the strip. If the strip was not in its plastic encapsulation, you would be able to tactilely feel the separations. Two final points...... Jaime Hull noted here (in post #15).... "a close look also shows that the ink color used for the name and team info and used to frame the image portion of the cards is quite clearly black, and not the dark brown that was used for all series of regular production" And, since you mentioned Mark Macrae (in post #16)....you'll recall that he was even more convinced than me, that these 5 cards were individually placed together on this "strip". Regards, TED Z |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
2. The back did not look pieced together to me. It looked like one piece. And under a loupe it looked just like any other T206 cardboard (without the ad printed on it). 3. I think they simply printed lines between cards on this particular pre-production test run. JimB |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Honus Wagner Backs | swschultz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-04-2009 06:09 PM |
T206 Wagner reprint on ebay...Blah Blah Blah... | iggyman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 08-10-2009 02:43 PM |
FS: T206 Heine Wagner ("the other T206 Wagner") PSA 4 - $79 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2007 08:46 PM |
Yet another T206 Wagner Ques.?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-13-2007 04:23 PM |
T206 Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-26-2002 02:12 PM |