![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm going to have to agree. The card appears to be trimmed on the bottom edge.
It would still look great in an SGC holder. Last edited by asoriano; 07-13-2010 at 12:23 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If that is a tiny enamel chip in the right border, I'd send it to PSA instead of SGC. SGC tends to grade harshly on flaking.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
go for it.
best, barry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks everyone for your comments and advise. I truly do appreciate it. I know that it is very tough to assess a card's value from a scan. This is the main reason why I have shifted to buying mostly graded cards the last couple of years. This card looked pretty good and I thought I would take a shot on it.
TBob you are very observant. At first when I examined the card the right edge just looked stained. In fact, the surface felt smooth and unbroken to the touch, but when I put the edge under magnification you can see some slight chipping in the stain just adjacent to Matty's shoulder. If that is the spot that you are referring to I applaud your eyesight. As to the bottom edge being trimmed I'm still not sure. I've read the article in the Detecting Card Alterations and compared the examples to the pictures in the article. Both bottom corners have small nicks or creases on the front of the card, but no evidence that the surface of the corner is wearing away like you would see in a card that has been trimmed. There is also some light chipping on the the bottom edge visible under magnification on the front of the card. This leads me to think that the edge hasn't been tampered with. On the other hand, the back of the card shows a pretty smooth bottom edge, as does all of the edges on the card. I also respect the experience of the members who have said that the bottom edge is trimmed. The article says detecting a trimmed card "is a piece of cake," but I guess I need to eat more cake. In the mean time I will take the card with to a card show in Cooperstown next weekend. There are some experts like Ted there who might give me their opinion. Best wishes, Joe |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
IMHO, that card is not an obvious trim. It may very well be fine. I think it is impossible to tell from the scan. One would have to look closely at the edges, compare it with the other edges, examine the roll (or lack thereof), etc., etc. I would get it graded.
JimB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As for SGC, someone already pointed out the special for July. But they also do volume deals. I'm not sure how many items it takes to qualify for that, but you should call and ask for a price on grading the whole group of 80 (assuming you can afford to pay to grade the works at once). My assumption is that they would quote you a better price per card on the group. Cheers, Blair
__________________
My Collection (in progress) at: http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/BosoxBlair |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Polar Bear by Series | PolarBear | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-17-2010 03:43 PM |
F/S - T205 (Polar Bear / Sovereign) - Updated | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 7 | 02-18-2009 04:27 PM |
Polar Bear Walter Johnson SGC 40 (only 2 SGC 50s higher) $530 delivered | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 02-28-2008 04:27 PM |
T206 Polar Bear Low Grade - moved to Ebay | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-12-2008 03:25 PM |
High Grade T206 Polar Bears | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-01-2006 04:57 PM |