 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you pay more for eye appeal over the assigned grade? | |||
| No, I'll only pay fair market value based on the assigned grade |
   
|
4 | 4.21% |
| Yes, I'll pay slightly more for a "high end" card |
  
|
33 | 34.74% |
| Yes, I'm willing to place a significant premium on a well centered and/or above average looking card |
  
|
58 | 61.05% |
| Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
07-12-2010, 09:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I only collect cards with good eye appeal. That's one reason why I don't own any complete sets. As for paying a premium, I believe we all do it. Just look at the prices for a '53 Bowman Pee Wee Reese or all the great horizontal shots in the T and E card sets ...
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VG E96 card with great eye appeal. Reduced | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 11-30-2007 08:37 PM |
| Who SHOULD command the highest premium? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-22-2006 10:32 PM |
| Uncatalogued Christy Mathewson Photo Premium | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-22-2005 04:11 PM |
| cards with best eye appeal | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-13-2002 12:41 AM |
| eye appeal... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-26-2002 08:23 AM |
Threaded Mode