![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not prewar, but I am partial to the 1971 Topps/OPC
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know this will be an unpopular post BUT, I really don't and never have, understood the attraction to card backs. I thought we collected the photos of the baseball players on the front, not the advertising on the back? I will never understand why someone would care what the back looks like, although I guess I can see some appreciation for the artwork, colors etc. But not enough to change what or why I collect, the ball players on the front. If all cards were issued with blank backs, would anyone not collect cards? Forgive my ignorance and I certainly don't wish to demean anyone's collecting decisions, I just felt I finally needed to ask the question and this seemed a reasonable place to do it. Thanks for listening.
__________________
I Remember Now. ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tony -
I understand many are not into the backs. Most issues I'm the same...it's the front the matters. But there are a few issues where I just find the backs to be pretty cool. For me it all started when I was into the T206 set and started really focusing on backs and that just kind of branched out. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's cool, I tried it also with T206s, I just couldn't get into it. I guess to answer the question, I always thought the Red Sun back was really neat looking.
__________________
I Remember Now. ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Personally I love collecting the backs. I like them MORE than the fronts. I don't know why...maybe it's because it's how many of them are identified or, because of them, it makes some far more scarce than others. I have just always enjoyed it. My first back collecting was the M101-4/5's....then the E94 Overprints then...the list goes on...
The back of this one makes it arguably the best T207 in the hobby. With a more common back it's still a nice card but not the special one that the Red Cross makes it. Again, it's like chocolate and vanilla. To each their own.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 07-12-2010 at 10:00 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like collecting backs...as well as fronts...and the ones I like best are the ones that are very colorful...or ornate...like:
red hindu, red sun, mono, t214 victory, t215 pirate... Additionally without the back...in a lot of cases...we wouldn't know what set a card is from?! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Unfortunately, the cards I read as a kid are well outside the scope of this board, so I won't bother elaborating about them. Within the scope of Net54, I do like some of the more elaborate back designs, like Red Sun.
__________________
Hobby Guy Website - http://www.obaks.com/vintagebaseballcards/index.html Blog - http://thevintagesportscards.blogspot.com/ Bookshelf - http://www.obaks.com/vintagebaseballcards/books.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1956 Topps has a great back design--love the cartoons...
Prewar--T206 brands take the cake in my book. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm partial to the Red Sun and Polar Bear backs.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim!!!
Wow!!! ![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
T205 backs and the Bios and stats on them
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Your Absolute Favorite Card! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 60 | 12-08-2007 07:41 PM |
Favorite Card / Not for Value Just looks T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 01-14-2006 05:33 AM |
Favorite T206 Artistic Flare Pose card or cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 04-24-2005 11:38 PM |
wanted minor league T card issues | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 01-28-2005 06:43 PM |
Favorite Card / "The One That Got Away" thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 12-16-2003 09:18 AM |