Flaking vs. paper loss

[jbsports33]

Any type of paper loss weather it seems to be a small amount as explained above or a even just scuffing it can be bad for the overall grade.

Jimmy

[Orions father]

Thanks Jeff, I could not be happier with the card whatever the grade.
Pete, no offense, but that is one of the most misgraded N28's I have seen. Going off it, the Ward should get an easy 7.
Both company's are inconsistent on grading N28's. The SGC Malone has paper loss on the front but grades higher than 30. The Mulvey has a streak across the front and the Caruthers has some strange Alfalfa mark but it managed a 70. The PSA Malone is stained and it still recieves a 5?

[Orions father]

Just got the results back on the Ward and it didnt cross beacuse of being Rebuilt. It is the only card I need for my all SGC N28 set and I am upset beacuse I thought I was finally done. Does PSA stand by thier guarantee or should I even bother with them?

[Leon]

I think you will have an uphill battle fighting PSA on a rebuilt card. It's worth a try though...

[ethicsprof]

sorry to hear about the 'rebuilt'.
i'm with Leon; i'd give it a try.
the card is a beaut!!

best,
barry

[teetwoohsix]

Wow, that sucks David. PSA gave it a numerical grade, and now it won't cross to SGC because it's rebuilt. I think PSA should be obligated to reimburse you the price of a VG 3 Ward.

Clayton

[Orions father]

Barry, I agree with you that it is a "beaut" until SGC evaluated that the card was rebuilt. I have a real problem with rebuilt and trimmed cards, I would rather have paper loss and heavy creases. When a factor of deceit comes in, it changes my view of the card no matter how it looks. That is just my 2 cents. Thanks for the compliments and opinions, I will post an update if it happens.