|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think that DeLong probably just didn't have enough money to print a bigger set. Their company was an upstart that year. I've always been fascinated with that set, so many HOF's, so few cards.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
great thread !
it would have been nice to see these cards produced. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just about any 50's Topps Musial card, 58, 57, and 58 in particular.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jeff... is this the website you're referring to?
http://www.vintagecardtraders.org/vi...do/pseudo.html |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Awesome.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just a thought , maybe the Babe didn't want to appear on the '34 goudey set because of the "Lou Gehrig or Chuck Klein says" design? The lack of a Gehrig Playball card from '39 or even '40 is one I can't figure out , I am not sure when the '39 cards hit the market , but I would think even if it was after his retirement, they would still issue one . I think the issue with Ted Williams , Feller , Musial , maybe Jackie Robinson and probably several others from the early '50's was them selling their rights to either Topps or Bowman but not both.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Still annoying though that all the stars aren't in a single issue until Topps bought out Bowman, and even then Musial is missing until 59. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
The actual fact is that at the time Ruth and Gehrig absolutely HATED each other and there was no way Babe was going to have a card in a "Lou Gehrig" set. What I can't figure out is why Gehrig didn't have a '35 Goudey or beyond. Unless he had bad dealings with Goudey over his '34 set or signed an exclusive elsewhere it just doesn't make sense.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yessir! That's the one. Great handiwork |
![]() |
|
|