 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
06-10-2010, 02:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Matt- I do see a little gray area here. In the case of the E97 Young it's a hand drawn pitching pose, and the face is indistinct. Convention says it's not Cy but there is not enough for anyone to go on by examining the face.
But the N403 is a portrait photograph. And there is no way that's Cap Anson. It kind of hits you a little harder here. I can let the E97 Young slide but no way this portrait can ever be Cap Anson. So as I said why not have both Anson and Dalrymple on the label, not just one. Does that make sense? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Collector, Mastro, PSA & Our Beloved Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 85 | 05-31-2008 01:55 PM |
| How Would You Change The Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 04-06-2008 02:32 PM |
| This is the Most Important Topic in the Hobby! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-29-2006 04:35 AM |
| When It Was A Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-06-2005 10:17 AM |
| Hobby History 101 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-16-2003 02:59 PM |
Threaded Mode